• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S
李红星, 高飞, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 夏玉米秸秆还田量和施氮量对冬小麦产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(7): 1260-1270. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2021606
引用本文: 李红星, 高飞, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 夏玉米秸秆还田量和施氮量对冬小麦产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(7): 1260-1270. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2021606
LI Hong-xing, GAO Fei, REN Bai-zhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG Ji-wang. Effects of straw incorporation and nitrogen application rate on winter wheat yield and nitrogen utilization[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(7): 1260-1270. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2021606
Citation: LI Hong-xing, GAO Fei, REN Bai-zhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG Ji-wang. Effects of straw incorporation and nitrogen application rate on winter wheat yield and nitrogen utilization[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(7): 1260-1270. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2021606

夏玉米秸秆还田量和施氮量对冬小麦产量和氮素利用的影响

Effects of straw incorporation and nitrogen application rate on winter wheat yield and nitrogen utilization

  • 摘要:
    目的 研究夏玉米秸秆还田量和施氮量对冬小麦产量和氮素利用的影响,为提高秸秆和氮肥利用效率,实现冬小麦高产高效提供理论依据。
    方法 本试验于2019—2021年在山东农业大学试验站进行。分别在夏玉米秸秆全量还田(S)、半量还田(1/2S)和不还田(CK)条件下,设施氮量为N 210 kg/hm2 (N)和178.5 kg/hm2 (−15%N),即SN、S−15%N、1/2SN、1/2S–15%N、CKN和CK–15%N,共6个处理。分析小麦不同生育时期地上部氮素积累量、氮素营养指数(NNI)、氮素吸收效率(UPE)、吸收氮素利用效率(UTE)和氮素利用率(NUE)。
    结果 与CKN处理相比,SN、S–15%N和1/2SN处理的小麦产量分别显著增加了12.79%、11.24%和12.63%,成熟期地上部氮素积累量分别显著增加了24.45%、22.81%和23.51% (P<0.05)。SN和1/2SN处理小麦成熟期土壤无机态氮累积量分别较CKN处理显著增加了4.81%和3.19%,S–15%N和1/2S–15%N处理较CK–15%N处理分别显著增加了8.28%和5.15%。小麦拔节期,CKN处理的NNI为0.90,其余处理较CKN显著降低8.14%~25.56%。小麦开花后,SN处理的NNI大于1,且比CKN显著增加了28.66%;S–15%N和1/2SN的NNI分别为0.98和1.08,分别较CKN处理显著增加20.66%和17.45%。SN、S–15%N和1/2SN处理的UPE较CKN分别显著增加16.99%、42.65%和27.15%。与CKN相比,SN和S–15%N处理的UTE分别显著降低10.68%和8.29%。SN、S–15%N和1/2SN处理的NUE较CKN分别显著增加10.41%、29.55%和14.19%。
    结论 不减少氮肥用量(N 210 kg/hm2),夏玉米秸秆半量还田与全量还田的小麦产量无显著差异;与施氮量210 kg/hm2相比,减施15%氮肥,玉米秸秆全量还田不会显著降低小麦产量,且获得更高的氮肥利用效率,而半量还田小麦产量显著降低。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives This study explored the effects of summer maize straw returning and nitrogen (N) application rate on winter wheat yield and N utilization to provide a theoretical basis for efficient summer maize straw and N management.
    Methods The experiment was conducted in the Experimental Farm of Shandong Agricultural University from 2019 to 2021. There were six experimental treatments: incorporation of whole maize straw combined with N 210 kg/hm2 (SN) and 178.5 kg/hm2 (S–15%N), half of the maize straw combined with N 210 kg/hm2 (1/2SN) and 178.5 kg/hm2 (1/2S–15%N), and no maize straw incorporation with N 210 kg/hm2 (CKN) and 178.5 kg/hm2 (CK–15%N). The aboveground N accumulation, N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer utilization efficiency of each treatment were analyzed to understand the impact of maize straw returning on wheat yield and N utilization efficiency.
    Results The yield of SN, S–15%N, and 1/2SN (P<0.05) were increased by 12.79%, 11.24%, and 12.63%, compared with CKN. The aboveground N accumulation of SN, S–15%N, and 1/2SN (P<0.05) increased by 24.45%, 22.81%, and 23.51%, compared with CKN. The accumulation of soil inorganic N in SN and 1/2SN increased by 4.81% and 3.19% compared with CKN; S–15%N and 1/2S–15%N increased by 8.28% and 5.15% compared with CK–15%N. At the jointing stage, the NNI (P<0.05) decreased, which was 8.14%–25.56% lower than CKN (0.90). The NNI of SN (>1) at post-flowering increased by 28.66% compared with CKN, suggesting that N was surplus in the soil. While the NNI of S–15%N and 1/2SN were 0.98 and 1.08, respectively, the corresponding values increased by 20.66% and 17.45% compared with CKN. This indicated the optimum N content in the soil at the post-flowering stage of wheat. The UPE of wheat (P<0.05) increased with the maize straw returning. The values recorded for SN (16.99%), S–15%N (42.65%), and 1/2SN (27.15%) were higher than CKN. The UTE of SN and S–15%N were (P<0.05) lower than CKN by 10.68% and 8.29%. The NUE of SN, S–15%N, and 1/2SN increased by 10.41%, 29.55%, and 14.19%, compared with CKN.
    Conclusions Without reducing the rate of N fertilizer (N 210 kg/hm2), there was no significant difference in wheat yield between the half and full return of summer maize straw. Reduced N fertilizer application by 15% with full maize straw return to the field did not reduce wheat yield but increased N utilization efficiency. Returning half of the maize straw to the field with the same amount of N reduction, on the other hand, reduced wheat yield.

     

/

返回文章
返回