• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S
谢先进, 张俊伶. 丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)对玉米/蚕豆和玉米/稗草互作体系植物生长的反馈调节[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(3): 643-649. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.14431
引用本文: 谢先进, 张俊伶. 丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)对玉米/蚕豆和玉米/稗草互作体系植物生长的反馈调节[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(3): 643-649. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.14431
XIE Xian-jin, ZHANG Jun-ling. Feedback of abuscular mycorrhizal fungi on interactions between maize/fababean and maize/barnyardgrass[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(3): 643-649. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.14431
Citation: XIE Xian-jin, ZHANG Jun-ling. Feedback of abuscular mycorrhizal fungi on interactions between maize/fababean and maize/barnyardgrass[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(3): 643-649. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.14431

丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)对玉米/蚕豆和玉米/稗草互作体系植物生长的反馈调节

Feedback of abuscular mycorrhizal fungi on interactions between maize/fababean and maize/barnyardgrass

  • 摘要: 【目的】丛枝菌根真菌(arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi,简称AMF)对农田生态系统中作物的生长起着重要作用。不同宿主植物和作物种植方式对土壤中菌根真菌具有一定的选择性,从而影响菌根真菌对后茬植物生长的反馈效应。间作体系是农业生产中增产增效的一种重要的种植模式,明确AMF在间作体系中对植物生长的反馈作用,对理解间作体系地上-地下相互作用具有重要的意义。【方法】本试验采用三种常见的AMF(Funneliformis mosseae、Rhizophagus intraradices和Claroideoglomus claroideum)混合接种剂,在单作(玉米,蚕豆,稗草)和间作(玉米/蚕豆和玉米/稗草)条件下,通过两个阶段(AMF驯化及反馈)的反馈试验,模拟研究了三种植物在单作和间作中的反馈强度及AMF的调节作用。【结果】在驯化阶段,玉米/稗草间作体系中,与单作相比,间作玉米地上部生物量减少了64.0%,间作稗草地上部生物量增加了47.8%。玉米/蚕豆间作体系中,与单作相比,两者作物地上部生物量增量分别达21.7%和38.3%。反馈阶段中,单作时,与灭菌处理相比接种AMF后玉米、稗草和蚕豆的地上部生物量分别增加602.3%、 80.6%和21.1%; 间作时,与灭菌处理相比接种AMF后玉米地上部生物量平均增加613.1%,稗草增加80.7%, 蚕豆增加21.4%。单作玉米存在负到零反馈作用,与灭菌处理相比,接种AMF后玉米负反馈作用减弱至零反馈作用。从单作到间作,玉米的反馈作用由负变为零到正反馈作用。【结论】玉米和稗草之间是竞争关系,玉米处于竞争弱势稗草处于竞争优势。玉米对AMF的响应最为强烈,其次是稗草,最后是蚕豆。接种AMF或与其它植物间作后均减弱玉米的负反馈作用,表明丛枝菌根真菌可通过减弱单作玉米的负反馈实现间作增产。

     

    Abstract: 【Objectives】 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) plays an important role in contributing to plant growth in agro-ecosystems. Feedback of AMF communities pre-trained by different host plants and cropping types may influence the growth of subsequent plants, and intercropping system contributes to increase in yield and resource use efficiency. Therefore, understanding on feedback of AMF has a positive significance in elucidating yield increase in intercropping systems.【Methods】 Three isolates of AM fungi of Funneliformis mosseae, Rhizophagus intraradices and Claroideoglomus claroideum, three plant species of maize (Zea mays L.), fababean (Vicia faba L.) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli L.), and two intercropping systems (facilitation system of maize/fababean and competition system of maize/barnyardgrass) were established to investigate the feedback effects at the phases of two plant training and feedback.【Results】 Data showed that shoot biomass of maize decreased by 64.0% during training phase compared to monoculture in maize/barnyardgrass intercropping system, and the later increased shoot biomass of barnyardgrass by 47.8%. Maize and fababean respectively enhanced the shoot biomass of the plants by 21.7% and 38.3% based on the comparison between double plant cropping and monocropping. During the feedback phase, shoot biomass of maize, barnyardgrass and fababean increased by 602.3%, 80.6% and 21.1% respectively in monoculture system after inoculated with AMFs. In intercropping system, shoot biomass of maize increased by 613.1%, and shoot biomass of barnyardgrass by 80.7%, and shoot biomass of fababean by 21.4%. Monoculture maize exhibited a negative feedback, and the inoculation of AMF and intercropping with barnyardgrass or fababean relieved negative feedback in monocropping maize.【Conclusions】 The competition dominated in maize/barnyardgrass intercropping system compared to monoculture. Facilitation between maize and fababean enhanced the biomass of the respective plants. AMF inoculation increased the biomass of maize, followed by those of barnyardgrass and fababean. The inoculation of AMF, and intercropping with barnyardgrass or fababean relieved negative feedback of monocropping maize. In conclusion, AMF can relive negative feedback of maize and are attributed to the facilitation of maize/fababean intercropping system.

     

/

返回文章
返回