• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S
李昂, 黄岩, 樊小林. 脲醛氮肥不影响叶菜的甲醛残留量及食用安全[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(3): 752-758. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.15044
引用本文: 李昂, 黄岩, 樊小林. 脲醛氮肥不影响叶菜的甲醛残留量及食用安全[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(3): 752-758. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.15044
LI Ang, HUANG Yan, FAN Xiao-lin. Negligible effect of urea-formaldehyde as N fertilizer on the formaldehyde content and edible safety in leafy vegetables[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(3): 752-758. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.15044
Citation: LI Ang, HUANG Yan, FAN Xiao-lin. Negligible effect of urea-formaldehyde as N fertilizer on the formaldehyde content and edible safety in leafy vegetables[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(3): 752-758. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.15044

脲醛氮肥不影响叶菜的甲醛残留量及食用安全

Negligible effect of urea-formaldehyde as N fertilizer on the formaldehyde content and edible safety in leafy vegetables

  • 摘要: 【目的】研究脲醛氮肥(UF)对生菜、 上海青体内甲醛累积量、 甲醛含量的影响,评价其在叶菜上施用的安全性。【方法】采用3因素4水平完全设计分别进行第一次生菜及上海青盆栽试验。三因素为 50%尿素+50%脲醛活性系数 (AI)=67%,UF1、 50%尿素+50%脲醛(AI=57%,UF2)、 100%尿素(U); 施氮量设4个水平,分别是每千克土壤 N0、 100、 200、 300 mg,共 12 个处理,每个处理6个重复。采用4因素3水平完全设计进行第二次生菜盆栽试验,四个因素分别是AI分别为55%的脲醛(UF3)、 63%的脲醛(UF4)、 72%的脲醛(UF5)和100%尿素(U)(含 N 46%); 施氮量设3个水平,分别是每千克土壤 N 0、 200、 300 mg,共 12 个处理,每个处理6个重复。收获后,用乙酰丙酮法测定植株甲醛含量。【结果】无论施氮与否,生菜和上海青体内均能检测到甲醛。无氮对照在第一次生菜和上海青试验中的甲醛累积量分别为 0.21和0.35 mg/pot,在第二次生菜试验的生菜甲醛含量为 1.72 mg/kg。第一次生菜试验施 N 100 mg/kg土 时,U和 U+UF处理的生菜体内甲醛是无氮对照的 2.7~2.8 倍,但施氮处理间(U、 U+UF)无差异。在施 N 200、 300 mg/kg土时,U处理的生菜甲醛累积量明显大于U+UF处理,尿素处理甲醛累积量分别为 0.68、 0.56 mg/pot; 施 N 200 mg/kg土时,U处理的甲醛累积量比 UF1 + U和 UF2 + U 处理分别高出 26%、 33%,N 300 mg/kg土时的相应值是 30%、 24%。第二次生菜试验,两个施氮水平下,U和 UF5处理的甲醛含量最大; 施 N 200 mg/kg土时,UF3和UF4处理的生菜体内甲醛含量与无氮处理的无差异,当施氮量增加到300 mg/kg土时,活性指数为 55%的 UF3 与无氮处理的生菜甲醛含量无差异,活性指数为 63%的UF4的生菜甲醛含量甚至明显低于无氮处理。U和 UF5 处理的生菜甲醛含量范围为 4.97~5.36 mg/kg,UF3和 UF4处理的分别比 UF5处理的降低了68%和 70%,分别比U处理的的降低了69%和 71%。施氮量从 N 100 mg/kg土增加到 300 mg/kg土,均未影响叶菜体内的甲醛残留。【结论】与常规尿素相比,单独施用脲醛氮肥或尿素与脲醛氮肥混合施用,无论脲醛氮肥活性指数从 50%增加到 71%,还是氮肥用量从 100 增加到 300 mg/kg土,均不会增加叶菜体内的甲醛残留量,并且甲醛残留量处于安全范围内。

     

    Abstract: 【Objectives】 The residue of the formaldehyde accumulation (FA) and in leafy vegetables with urea-formaldehyde (UF) application is concerned by public. The safety of UF as N fertilizer applied on leafy vegetables was investigated in this paper.【Methods】The first pot experiment with three factors and four levels were conducted using lettuce and Chinese cabbage as materials. Three factors were 50%U + 50% UF activity index (AI) was 67%, UF1), 50%U + 50% UF (AI was 57%, UF2) and the U. Four levels were the N application as 0, 100, 200, 300 mg/kg soil. Each treatment was repeated 6 times and 12 treatments in total. The first pot experimental with four factors and three levels used lettuce as materials. Four factors were UF which the AI was 55% (UF3), 63% (UF4), and 72 %( UF5) and U (the nitrogen content was 46%). Three levels were the N application as 0, 200, 300 mg/kg soil. Each treatment was repeated 6 times and 12 treatments in total. The formaldehyde contents in the vegetables were measured by the Acetylacetone Spectrophotometric method after harvest.【Results】The formaldehyde was detected in vegetables on both treatments with and without N. The FA was 0.21 mg/pot and 0.35 mg/pot in the first lettuce and Chinese cabbage experiments and the formaldehyde content was 1.72 mg/kg of CK treatments. In the first lettuce experiment under N application level of 100 mg/kg soil, FA in U and U+UF treatment were about 2.7 to 2.8 times larger than in CK, however, there was no difference between U and U+UF treatments and when under N application levels of 200 and 300 mg/kg soil, FA in Urea treatment was 0.68 and 0.56 mg/pot, significantly higher than in U+UF treatment. The FA in U treatment was 26% and 33% higher than in UF1 + U and UF2 + U treatments respectively under N 200 mg/kg, and 30% and 24% higher than in UF1 + U and UF2 + U treatments under N 300 mg/kg. In the second lettuce experiment, the formaldehyde content of the U and UF5 treatments were the largest. There was no significant difference in formaldehyde content among treatments of CK, UF3 and UF4 under N 200 mg/kg. Also, no significant difference of formaldehyde content was tested between CK and UF3 treatments under N 300 mg/kg. But the formaldehyde content of UF4 was even significantly lower than that of CK treatment. The range of formaldehyde content of lettuce was from 4.97 to 5.36 mg/kg for both U and UF5 (AI=71.8%) and the formaldehyde content of UF3 and UF4 was decreased by 68% and 70% compared to that of UF5 respectively. The formaldehyde content of UF3 and UF4 was 69% and 71% lower than in U treatment respectively. The formaldehyde content and accumulation in leafy vegetables was not affected by amount of N application from N 100 to 300 mg/kg.【Conclusions】Compared with urea, whether application of urea-formaldehyde individually or mixed with urea, no matter the activity index of the urea-formaldehyde from 50% to 71.8% and whatever the N dosage from 100 to 300 mg per kilogram soil, the formaldehyde content in leafy vegetables will not be influenced and the formaldehyde residues in leafy vegetables is safe.

     

/

返回文章
返回