• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S
杨靖一, G.A.Wadsworth, D.J.Greenwood. 三种蔬菜氮肥效应曲线的比较研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1995, 1(1): 71-78. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.1995.0111
引用本文: 杨靖一, G.A.Wadsworth, D.J.Greenwood. 三种蔬菜氮肥效应曲线的比较研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1995, 1(1): 71-78. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.1995.0111
Yang Jingyi G.A.Wadsworth D.J. Greenwood, . A COMPARISON STUDY OF THREE TYPES OF N-FERTILIZER RESPONSE CURVES ON VEGETABLES[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 1995, 1(1): 71-78. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.1995.0111
Citation: Yang Jingyi G.A.Wadsworth D.J. Greenwood, . A COMPARISON STUDY OF THREE TYPES OF N-FERTILIZER RESPONSE CURVES ON VEGETABLES[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 1995, 1(1): 71-78. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.1995.0111

三种蔬菜氮肥效应曲线的比较研究

A COMPARISON STUDY OF THREE TYPES OF N-FERTILIZER RESPONSE CURVES ON VEGETABLES

  • 摘要: 本文选取英国ADAS.19871989年的三种蔬菜(花茎甘蓝、大白菜、韭葱)氮肥试验为材料,分别选取总产量、干物重和市场产量为因变量,以施N量为自变量,对具有代表性的三种肥料效应函数:二次型Y=b0+b1X+b2X2(M1)、线性加指数Y=a+brx+cX(M2)、倒线性Y=dbX/(8+bX)+cX(M3)进行了系统的比较研究。研究结果指出:用三种模型所配置的60个肥料效应方程均有55个达到了F0.1以上显著水准,其中M2具有最大的平均回归方差贡献率(93%)和最小的平均残差方差(15.9)。进一步t检验指出:用M1所预报的最高平均产量显著高于M2和M3的预报结果。但M2所计算的平均最高施肥量显著低于M1和M3的计算结果。从模型的极值点考虑,M2较适合于模拟花茎计蓝、大白菜的肥料效应曲线;M3较适合于模拟花茎甘蓝、韭葱的肥料效应的曲线;M1的通用性较强。

     

    Abstract: This study was based on the experimntal data from ADAS.U.K.(1987-1989).Total yield.dry wieght and marketable yield were selected as Y variables, and N fertilizer applied as X variable for each of eight experiments.Three types of response curves:quadratic Y-b0+b1X+b2X2 (M1),linear plus exponential Y-a+brx+cX(M2) and inverse linear Y-abX/(a+bX)+cX(M3), have been fitted for each of the three variables in order to give a comparison as to which one is the best fit at each site.F test shown that among 60 N response equations fitted by three models.55 passed F0.1 and above significant levels.but linear plus exponential has a maximum average percentage variance accountted for (%v.a.f.-93%) and a minimum average residual variance (15.9). The further t test shown that average maximum yield predicted by M1 was significantly higher than that predicted by M 2 M3.But average maximum N calculated by M 2 was significantly lower than that calculated bY M 1 &M 3.Considering modelS maximum value.M2 is suited for calabrese and Chinese cabbage.M3 is suited for calabrese and 1eek.while M1 is suited for all three crops.

     

/

返回文章
返回