• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S
乔鑫鑫, 王艳芳, 李乾云, 包全发, 尹飞, 焦念元, 付国占, 刘领. 复种模式对豫西褐土团聚体稳定性及其碳、氮分布的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(3): 380-391. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.20323
引用本文: 乔鑫鑫, 王艳芳, 李乾云, 包全发, 尹飞, 焦念元, 付国占, 刘领. 复种模式对豫西褐土团聚体稳定性及其碳、氮分布的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(3): 380-391. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.20323
QIAO Xin-xin, WANG Yan-fang, LI Qian-yun, BAO Quan-fa, YIN Fei, JIAO Nian-yuan, FU Guo-zhan, LIU Ling. Effects of multi-cropping systems on cinnamon soil aggregate stability, carbon and nitrogen distribution in western Henan Province[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(3): 380-391. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.20323
Citation: QIAO Xin-xin, WANG Yan-fang, LI Qian-yun, BAO Quan-fa, YIN Fei, JIAO Nian-yuan, FU Guo-zhan, LIU Ling. Effects of multi-cropping systems on cinnamon soil aggregate stability, carbon and nitrogen distribution in western Henan Province[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(3): 380-391. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.20323

复种模式对豫西褐土团聚体稳定性及其碳、氮分布的影响

Effects of multi-cropping systems on cinnamon soil aggregate stability, carbon and nitrogen distribution in western Henan Province

  • 摘要:
    目的 长期单一的玉米–小麦复种模式会引起土壤结构破坏、农田生产力下降。探究不同复种模式对农田土壤团聚体稳定性及其碳、氮分布的影响,为维持土壤结构稳定,实现农业可持续发展提供科学依据。
    方法 定位试验在河南洛阳褐土上进行。设置冬小麦–夏玉米 (T1)、冬小麦–夏花生 (T2)、冬小麦–夏玉米||花生间作 (2行玉米间作4行花生,T3) 3个复种模式处理。试验始于2014年6月,2019年10月夏季作物收获后 (共11茬作物),采集0—20和20—40 cm土层土壤样品,利用湿筛法和干筛法分析土壤团聚体组成、团聚体稳定性、有机碳和全氮在不同粒级团聚体中的含量及分配比例。
    结果 与T1相比,在0—20 cm土层中,T2和T3处理土壤中 > 0.25 mm粒级的机械性团聚体 (DR0.25) 占比分别增加了5.9%和9.9%,> 0.25 mm粒级的水稳性团聚体 (WR0.25) 占比分别增加了50.3%和57.9%,不稳定性团粒指数 (ELT) 分别较T1减少了33.2%和50.6%,土壤团聚体破坏率 (PAD) 分别较T1减少49.3%和51.4%,土壤团聚体平均质量直径 (MWD) 分别较T1增加36.4%和47.0%,几何平均直径 (GMD) 分别较T1增加100.0%和120.0%。在20—40 cm土层中,T2和T3处理土壤中不稳定性团粒指数 (ELT) 分别较T1减少了13.2%和18.0%,土壤团聚体破坏率 (PAD) 分别较T1减少21.4%和28.8%,土壤团聚体平均质量直径 (MWD) 分别较T1增加4.8%和6.0%,几何平均直径 (GMD) 分别较T1增加11.5%和7.7%。各粒级的有机碳和全氮含量均以2~0.25 mm粒级最高,且0—20 cm土层的有机碳和全氮含量高于20—40 cm土层。与T1处理相比,T3处理显著提高了0—20 cm土层各粒级土壤全氮的贡献率和 > 0.25 mm粒级土壤有机碳的贡献率,降低了 < 0.25 mm粒级土壤有机碳的贡献率;T2处理显著提高了0—20 cm土层除 >2和<0.053 mm粒级外的土壤全氮的贡献率和 > 0.25 mm粒级土壤有机碳的贡献率,降低了0.25~0.053 mm粒级土壤有机碳的贡献率。与T1处理相比,T2和T3处理提升了0—20和20—40 cm土层土壤总有机碳、全氮、有效磷和速效钾的含量,3个处理的土壤容重和pH无显著差异。
    结论 冬小麦–夏花生、冬小麦–夏玉米||花生复种模式较传统冬小麦–夏玉米复种模式明显增加了土壤大团聚体含量,增强了团聚体的机械稳定性和水稳定性,还可显著提高土壤团聚体 (特别是 > 0.25 mm粒级团聚体) 的碳、氮含量,提高土壤有效磷和速效钾含量,更有利于豫西褐土区农田土壤肥力保持。且冬小麦–夏玉米||花生复种的效果优于冬小麦–夏花生复种。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives To address deterioration of soil structure and fertility caused by single long-term multi-cropping system of winter wheat-summer maize, alternative multi-cropping systems were tested for soil aggregate stability and nutrient availability in cinnamon soil of western Henan Province.
    Methods A field experiment was carried out from 2014 to 2019. The tested annual rotation systems were winter wheat-summer maize (T1), winter wheat-summer peanut (T2), winter wheat-summer maize and peanut intercropping (2 rows of maize intercropping with 4 rows of peanut, T3). Soil samples at the 0–20 cm and 20–40 cm depths were collected after the harvest of summer crop in 2019, when there were total of 11 cropping. The composition and stability of soil aggregates, as well as the contents and distribution rates of organic carbon and total nitrogen in each particle size aggregate were analyzed by wet and dry sieving methods.
    Results In the 0–20 cm soil layer, compared to T1 treatment, T2 and T3 treatments increased the > 0.25 mm mechanical aggregate (DR0.25) by 5.9% and 9.9%, increased the > 0.25 mm water stable aggregate (WR0.25) by 50.3% and 57.9%, decreased unstable soil aggregate index (ELT) by 33.2% and 50.6%, decreased the percentage of aggregate destruction (PAD) of soil by 49.3% and 51.4%, increased the mean weight diameter (MWD) of soil aggregates by 36.4% and 47.0% and increased the geometric mean diameter (GMD) by 100.0% and 120.0% respectively. In the 20–40 cm soil layer, T2 and T3 treatments decreased the unstable soil aggregate index (ELT) by 13.2% and 18.0%, decreased the percentage of aggregate destruction (PAD) of soil by 21.4% and 28.8%, increased the MWD of soil aggregates by 4.8% and 6.0% and increased the GMD by 11.5% and 7.7%, respectively, compared to T1 treatment. The contents of organic C and total N in 2–0.25 mm soil layer were the highest, and the contents of organic C and total N in 0–20 cm soil layer were higher than those in 20–40 cm soil layer. In the 0–20 cm soil layer, compared to T1 treatment, T3 treatment significantly increased the contribution rates of total N at all particle size aggregates and the contribution rate of organic carbon at >0.25 mm aggregate, profoundly decreased the contribution rate of organic C at <0.25 mm aggregate; T2 treatment also significantly increased the contribution rates of total N at 2–0.053 mm aggregates, and remarkably enhanced the contribution rate of organic C at >0.25 mm aggregate, but significantly decreased the contribution rate of organic C at 0.25–0.053 mm aggregate. Compared to T1 treatment, T2 and T3 treatments increased the contents of total organic C, total N, available P and readily available K, but the bulk density and pH had no significant difference among the three treatments in both 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil layers.
    Conclusions Compare to traditional winter wheat-summer maize cropping system, the winter wheat-summer peanut, winter wheat-summer maize and peanut intercropping have immense advantages in terms of increasing the content of soil macro-aggregates, enhancing the mechanical stability and water stability of soil aggregates, improving the accumulation of organic C and total N in soil aggregates (especially >0.25 mm aggregates), and increasing the content of available P and readily available K in soil, which are beneficial to maintain the soil fertility and the long-term health of the cinnamon soil in western Henan Province. And the effect of winter wheat-summer peanut cropping system is better than that of winter wheat-summer maize and peanut intercropping system.

     

/

返回文章
返回