• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S
刘占军, 祝慧, 张振兴, 赵家锐, 侯立耀, 翟丙年, 徐新朋, 雷秋良, 朱元骏. 我国苹果园施肥现状、土壤剖面氮磷分布特征及减肥增效技术[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(7): 1294-1304. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.20601
引用本文: 刘占军, 祝慧, 张振兴, 赵家锐, 侯立耀, 翟丙年, 徐新朋, 雷秋良, 朱元骏. 我国苹果园施肥现状、土壤剖面氮磷分布特征及减肥增效技术[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(7): 1294-1304. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.20601
LIU Zhan-jun, ZHU Hui, ZHANG Zhen-xing, ZHAO Jia-rui, HOU Li-yao, ZHAI Bing-nian, XU Xin-peng, LEI Qiu-liang, ZHU Yuan-jun. Current status of fertilization, distribution of N and P in soil profiles and techniques for reducing fertilizer application and improving efficiency in China’s apple orchards[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(7): 1294-1304. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.20601
Citation: LIU Zhan-jun, ZHU Hui, ZHANG Zhen-xing, ZHAO Jia-rui, HOU Li-yao, ZHAI Bing-nian, XU Xin-peng, LEI Qiu-liang, ZHU Yuan-jun. Current status of fertilization, distribution of N and P in soil profiles and techniques for reducing fertilizer application and improving efficiency in China’s apple orchards[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(7): 1294-1304. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.20601

我国苹果园施肥现状、土壤剖面氮磷分布特征及减肥增效技术

Current status of fertilization, distribution of N and P in soil profiles and techniques for reducing fertilizer application and improving efficiency in China’s apple orchards

  • 摘要:
    目的 全面认知我国苹果园施肥现状,明确苹果园土壤剖面氮磷分布特征,探究减肥增效和地力提升的果园管理技术,为我国苹果产业高质量发展提供理论依据和技术支撑。
    方法 基于文献资料,制定我国苹果合理化肥施用量;采用实地调查和文献数据相结合的方法,明确和评价我国苹果主产区化肥施用现状;通过田间采样与室内分析,明晰灌区和非灌区苹果园土壤硝态氮和Olsen-P剖面变化特征;基于文献资料,集成苹果园减肥增效、地力提升和优质高产的管理技术。
    结果 我国苹果园化肥合理施用量为N 150~420 kg/hm2、P2O5 90~330 kg/hm2和K2O 120~420 kg/hm2。目前我国苹果园化肥平均施用量分别为N 905 kg/hm2、P2O5 570 kg/hm2和K2O 675 kg/hm2,氮、磷、钾过量施肥现象普遍且较为严重;施肥结构上,重化肥轻有机肥现象明显,有机肥养分占比仅7.0%。旱作体系下,8年生苹果园土壤与农田相比,0—600 cm土壤剖面硝态氮含量差异不显著,25年生苹果园土壤在20—500 cm土层硝态氮含量显著高于农田,且在120 cm土层出现215 mg/kg的硝态氮峰值;灌区25年生苹果园0—800 cm土壤剖面硝态氮含量均高于100 mg/kg,在380 cm土层出现265 mg/kg的硝态氮峰值,且140—600 cm土层硝态氮含量显著高于旱作25年生苹果园土壤。土壤Olsen-P含量整体表现为0—100 cm土层下降、100—400 cm土层增加和400—600 cm土层基本稳定的趋势;旱作体系下,土壤Olsen-P含量在0—60 cm土层表现为25年生苹果园土壤 > 8年生苹果园土壤 ≈ 农田土壤,而在60—600 cm土层Olsen-P含量差异不显著;灌区25年生苹果园在60—120 cm土层土壤Olsen-P含量高于旱作25年生苹果园,且在80—100 cm土层出现一个14.5 mg/kg的峰值,460—560 cm土层也表现为灌溉果园的Olsen-P含量高于雨养果园的趋势。水肥一体化和推荐施肥是现实苹果园减肥增效的关键技术,有机无机肥配施、果园生草、施用生物炭是提高苹果园肥料利用效率及土壤肥力的重要途径。
    结论 我国苹果园过量施肥和不平衡施肥问题严重;高量施肥背景下长期苹果种植导致土壤深层剖面硝态氮和有效磷累积,无效化风险高,且灌溉加剧了氮、磷的淋溶风险;水肥一体化和苹果养分专家系统等推荐施肥,以及有机无机肥配施、果园生草、施用生物炭等是实现我国苹果园减肥增效和地力提升的关键技术,在今后苹果园管理方面,应加强不同生态区适宜的综合技术研究。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives The current status of fertilization and the ensuing N and P contents in soil profiles of China's main apple production areas were studied by reviewing published data, field surveys, and relevant laboratory analysis. We evaluated the techniques based on their potential to reduce fertilizer use, improve fertilizer use efficiency, and enhance soil fertility of apple orchards in China.
    Methods The reasonable application rates of fertilizers were established according to the literature data; the status of chemical fertilizers applied in main apple-producing regions was determined by field surveys and literature data; the contents of NO3-N and Olsen-P in soil profiles treated with and without irrigation were examined through field sampling and laboratory analysis; the techniques for reducing the application rates of fertilizers and increasing their efficiency, improving soil fertility, and underpinning high yield and quality for apple were integrated based on the literature.
    Results According to literature, the ational chemical fertilization rates for apple orchards in China were N 150–420 kg/hm2, P2O5 90–330 kg/hm2, and K2O 120–420 kg/hm2. However, the actual average rates were N 905 kg/hm2, P2O5 570 kg/hm2 and K2O 675 kg/hm2, showing a severe over-application of N, P and K fertilizers. Moreover, farmers eferred synthetic fertilizers to organic fertilizer, with an organic nutrient proportion of only 7.0%. In the rainfed orchards, the NO3-N content in 0–600 cm soil profile of the 8-year old apple orchards was similar to that in nearby farmlands, while the NO3-N content in 20–500 cm soil depth in 25-year old orchards were significantly higher than that in farmlands, with a peak value of 215 mg/kg in the 120 cm soil layer. In irrigated 25-year old orchards, the NO3-N content was higher than 100 mg/kg across the 800 cm soil profile, and the peak value was 265 mg/kg observed in the 380 cm soil layer. Notably, the NO3-N contents in 140–600 cm soil depth in irrigated 25-year orchards were significantly higher than the value recorded for rainfed 25-year apple orchards. The soil Olsen-P contents decreased in 0–100 cm layer but increased in 100–400 cm, and stabilized in 400–600 cm. In rainfed orchards, the Olsen-P contents in 0–60 cm layer followed the trend of 25-year orchards>8-year orchards and farmlands, while in 60–600 cm soil depth, the differenc in Olsen-P contents was not significant among the land-use types. Interestingly, the Olsen-P content in the 60–120 cm soil depth of irrigated 25-year orchard soils was higher than the value recorded for the rainfed 25-year orchards, the peak value of 14.5 mg/kg was observed in the 80–100 cm soil layer, and similar changes of Olsen-P content were observed in 460–560 cm depth. In general, our findings showed that over and imbalanced fertilization was poplula in China’s apple orchards. Long-term excessive fertilization resulted in the considerable accumulation of NO3-N and Olsen-P in deep soil profiles, and irrigation exaggerated their leaching, resulting in their unavailability for plant growth.
    Conclusions Fertilzation and nutrient expert system for apple can effectively reduce both water and nutrient input. Increasing organic fertilizer proportion can increase the even supply of nutrients. Grass covering and biochar application efficiently hold nutrients, improve organic matter content and fertile soil. Future studies should focus on the integrated application of the techniques that are suitable for different ecological regions.

     

/

返回文章
返回