• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

渭北旱地磷肥减施措施对冬小麦产量及磷吸收利用的影响

Effects of phosphorus reduction measures on winter wheat yield and phosphorus uptake and utilization in Weibei dryland

  • 摘要:
    目的 黄土高原渭北旱地麦区连续多年施用磷肥,小麦磷肥利用率和土壤磷有效性较低。通过田间试验探究了磷肥减量及改变施肥方法对冬小麦产量、磷素吸收利用以及土壤磷素盈余的影响,为黄土高原渭北旱地麦区磷肥高效利用提供依据。
    方法 在渭北旱区陕西永寿县连续进行3年田间试验,共设5个处理:对照(CK,不施磷肥),农户处理(FP,撒施P2O5 120 kg/hm2),减磷处理(RP,撒施P2O5 70 kg/hm2),条施处理(BF,条施P2O5 70 kg/hm2),硫酸铵处理(SA,硫酸铵替代尿素,撒施P2O5 70 kg/hm2)。在冬小麦拔节期、抽穗期及成熟期分别采集植株和土壤样品,测定小麦根系形态、磷含量及土壤pH、速效磷含量等,分析小麦生长、产量及构成因素、磷素吸收与积累、水分及磷肥利用率、土壤磷素盈亏的变化规律。
    结果 与CK相比,各施磷处理(FP、RP、BF、SA)显著提高了小麦籽粒产量及成熟期磷吸收量,3年平均增产640.8 kg/hm2 (11.4%),磷吸收量平均增加3.95 kg/hm2 (28.2%),而籽粒产量和成熟期磷吸收量在各施磷处理间无显著性差异;同时,FP和RP处理提高了小麦根系的总根长和根表面积。与FP处理相比,磷肥减量处理(RP、BF、SA)均显著提高了磷肥偏生产力和农学效率,降低了土壤表观磷盈余量,其中RP处理显著提高磷肥偏生产力70.2%、农学效率72.6%和磷肥当季回收率4.4个百分点;RP处理土壤表观磷年盈余量为12.7 kg/hm2,较FP处理显著降低了62.5%,而表观累积磷盈余降低了63.3 kg/hm2,进而降低土壤磷残余率21.8个百分点。等磷肥用量投入下,与RP处理相比,SA处理显著降低了小麦拔节期和抽穗期土壤pH 0.07个单位,土壤磷残余率显著降低1.4个百分点。
    结论 在黄土高原渭北旱地冬小麦种植区,施磷量由P2O5 120 kg/hm2减少至 70 kg/hm2仍能够保证土壤磷素供应和小麦生长,实现稳产,并可提高磷肥利用效率、降低土壤中磷素残留。在磷肥减施的基础上,采用硫酸铵替代尿素和条施措施虽未显著提升小麦产量和水肥利用效率,但硫酸铵替代尿素能有效降低小麦拔节和抽穗期土壤pH和土壤磷残留率。因此,基于磷素收支平衡与环境条件,配合施用硫酸铵的磷肥减量管理是实现渭北旱地冬小麦高产与磷肥增效的有效途径。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives Continuous phosphorus (P) application might be a reason for the low wheat P use efficiency and soil P availability in the upland winter wheat production area of Weibei, the Loess Plateau. So, we studied the effects of P fertilizer reduction and the fertilizer application methods on wheat yield and P use efficiency.
    Methods A three-year winter wheat field trial was carried out in the rainfed area of the Loess Plateau (Yongshou County, Shaanxi Province). The experiment included no P fertilizer control (CK), farmers’ practice (FP, P2O5 120 kg/hm2 by broadcasting), merely P fertilizer reduction (RP, P2O5 70 kg/hm2 by broadcasting), P reduction combined with banding application (BF), and with ammonium sulfate replacing urea (SA). Wheat plants were sampled at jointing, heading, and maturity stage for measurement of root morphology, shoot and grain weight and P content. At the same stages, soil (0−20 cm) samples were collected to determine the soil water, pH, and available P content. The water and P fertilizer use efficiency, and soil P budgets were calculated.
    Results Compared with CK, P fertilization increased grain yield and P uptake by 640.8 kg/hm2 and 3.95 kg/hm2, equal to an increase rate of 11.4% and 28.2% on average of 3 years, however, P application rate and method did not cause significant differences. FP and RP treatments increased the root total length and surface areas. Compared with the FP treatment, the RP, BF, and SA treatments significantly increased P fertilizer use efficiency and decreased P surplus. Of these three treatments, the RP treatment significantly increased the partial factor productivity of P by 70.2%, the agronomic efficiency by 72.6% and P recovery efficiency by 4.4 percentage points, reduced apparent P surplus by 12.7 kg/hm2 (62.5%) and soil accumulated P surplus by 63.3 kg/hm2 and thus resulted in a decrease of P surplus rate by 21.8 percentage points. Under the same rate of P fertilizer application, compared with the RP treatment, the SA treatment significantly reduced soil pH at wheat jointing and heading stages (0.07 unit), and P surplus rate by 1.4 percentage points.
    Conclusions In the Weibei dryland areas of Loess Plateau, reducing the P fertilizer (P2O5) application rate from 120 to 70 kg/hm2 can maintain winter wheat yield and soil P supply, improve P use efficiency, and reduce P surplus. On the basis of reduced P fertilizer input (RP), the input of ammonium sulfate instead of urea (SA) and banding application of P fertilizer (BF) did not improve wheat yield, P and water use efficiency, however, the SA treatment could effectively adjust the soil pH in wheat jointing and heading stages and decrease soil P surplus rate at maturing stage. Therefore, the method of reduced P fertilizer input combined with ammonium sulfate fertilizer could be used as an optimal P management regime to achieve high wheat yield and efficient utilization of P resources in the Weibei dryland areas.

     

/

返回文章
返回