• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

秸秆还田及有机肥替代化肥对塿土物理肥力及作物产量的影响

Effects of straw return and organic fertilizer substitution for chemical fertilizers on physical fertility and crop yield of loess soil

  • 摘要:
    目的 秸秆和有机肥高效利用是实现我国农业绿色高效发展的重要途径之一,也是改善深入探讨有机肥对土壤物理肥力的有效措施影响有助于科学施用有机肥,提升土壤质量。本研究探讨了秸秆还田、以及有机肥替代化肥比例对塿土土壤物理性质及作物产量的影响,为区域合理的养分资源管理及作物高产高效提供理论依据。
    方法 研究基于陕西关中平原塿土连续9年的冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系有机肥投入量定位试验连续进行了9年。选择试验的。在小麦-玉米双季秸秆还田(SNPK)、50%有机肥替代化肥(50%M)、以及100%有机肥替代化肥(100%M)、较单施化肥(NPK)四个处理小区,采集田间原状土,分析土壤容重、总孔隙度、团聚体分布、团聚体稳定性、水分特征曲线、饱和导水率以及非饱和导水率,观测作物根系生长以及产量。
    结果 与单施化肥(NPK)相比,秸秆还田以及有机肥施用处理没有显著影响土壤容重、总孔隙度、团聚体分布比例及团聚体稳定性。土壤水分特征曲线结果显示,在30 kPa下100%M处理土壤含水量显著高于NPK处理,其他吸力下各处理土壤含水量整体趋势表现为NPK<50%M<SNPK<100%M。100%M处理较NPK显著提高了表层土壤的毛管孔隙体积,并显著提高了土壤亚表层无效孔隙的体积。与NPK相比,秸秆还田以及有机肥施用提高了土壤饱和导水率,但两处理间非饱和导水率没有显著差异。此外,施用有机肥显著提高了表层土壤中夏玉米的根重密度和根长密度,对冬小麦根系生长没有显著影响。SNPK和50%M能够维持与NPK相似的作物产量和生物量,而100%M较NPK处理显著降低了夏玉米的产量和冬小麦的生物量以及总产量和总生物量,没有显著影响冬小麦产量和夏玉米生物量。
    结论 陕西关中平原冬小麦-夏玉米体系秸秆双季还田配合化肥以及50%有机肥替代化肥9年后改善了土壤持水能力,促进了夏玉米根系生长,维持了与NPK相似的产量。而100%施用有机肥降低了作物处理以及养分对玉米产量的贡献,对土壤物理性状没有明显的改善。因此,试验区域不适宜100%施用有机肥,秸秆还田和以50%有机肥替代化肥在合作物产量以及土壤物理肥力要素的效应也还需要继续监测。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Efficient utilization of agricultural organic byproducts stands as an pivotal strategy for advancing green agricultural development in China. This study explored the effects of straw return and organic fertilizer substitution for chemical fertilizer on soil physical properties and crop yields in loess soils. The objective is to furnish a theoretical framework for optimizing nutrient management and enhancing agricultural efficiency in the region.
    Methods The research was based on a nine-year field experiment conducted in loess soil of Guanzhong Plain, the cropping system was winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-summer maize(Zea mays L.) rotation. Undisturbed soil samples were collected from plots subjected to four treatments: straw return with chemical fertilizers (SNPK), 50% and 100% organic fertilizer substitution for chemical fertilizers (50%M and 100%M), and a control treatment using only chemical fertilizers (NPK). Analyses encompassed soil bulk density, total porosity, aggregate distribution, aggregate stability, moisture retention characteristics, saturated and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, crop root development, and yield assessments.
    Results The implementation of straw return and organic fertilizer application did not yield significant alterations in soil bulk density, total porosity, aggregate distribution, or aggregate stability compared to the NPK treatment. However, the soil water retention analysis revealed that the 100%M treatment exhibited a notably higher water-holding capacity at 30 kPa than the NPK treatment. Across other suction levels, a general trend of NPK<50%M<SNPK<100%M in soil water content was observed. The 100%M treatment significantly augmented capillary pore volume in the topsoil and increased ineffective pore volume in the subsoil compared to NPK. Both straw return and manure application generally enhanced soil saturated hydraulic conductivity relative to NPK, though no significant disparities in unsaturated hydraulic conductivity were noted among treatments. Furthermore, manure application significantly boosted root weight density and root length density of summer maize in the topsoil, with no discernible impact on winter wheat root traits. Crop yields from the SNPK and 50%M treatments were comparable to those from NPK, whereas the 100%M treatment led to a significant reduction in summer maize yield and total yield (wheat plus maize).
    Conclusions After nine years of double-season straw return or 50% organic fertilizer substitution for chemical fertilizer in the wheat-maize cropping system in the Guanzhong Plain of Shaanxi, soil physical properties were improved to certain extent, and crop root growth was influenced, while crop yield was comparable to that under NPK alone. Considering the trade-offs between crop yield and soil physical fertility, both straw return and manure substitution for chemical fertilizer are recommended, but the substitution rate should be controlled within 50%.

     

/

返回文章
返回