• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

包膜控释和基质缓释氮肥在水稻种植中的农学及环境效应评价

Agronomic and environmental impacts of coated controlled-release and matrix slow-release nitrogen fertilizers in rice cultivation

  • 摘要:
    目的 探究包膜控释氮肥和基质缓释氮肥在水稻种植中的农学和环境效应,为稻田绿色施氮提供依据。
    方法 田间试验在江西九江晚稻田进行,设置常规氮肥一基一追 (U)、包膜控释氮肥一次基施 (P)、基质缓释氮肥一次基施 (M)处理,并设置不施氮肥对照 (CK)。每次施氮肥后,连续监测土壤氨挥发和N2O排放通量,计算其累积排放损失量。插秧后,每10天采集一次淋溶液,每次降雨后采集田面水样,测定铵态氮和硝态氮含量,计算淋溶和径流氮损失量。在5个主要生育期,取0—20 cm土层土样,测定铵态氮和硝态氮含量,同时取植株样,调查生物量和植株氮吸收量,成熟期调查水稻产量及构成因素。
    结果 P和M处理的水稻产量较U分别提高了29.3%和30.2%,氮肥利用率分别提高了20.6和17.8个百分点。与U相比,一次施用P处理显著降低了苗期稻田铵态氮含量,增加了分蘖—拔节和拔节—抽穗阶段的水稻氮素累积,吸氮量分别增加了12.3%和39.9%,显著降低了氨挥发33.4%、氮淋溶12.3%和氮径流损失44.5%,总活性氮损失量降低了33.6%;一次性施用M处理增加了分蘖—拔节期吸氮量109.3%,促进前期的氮素累积,降低了16.5%淋溶氮损失,增加了74.6%的径流氮损失,总活性氮损失上升16.8%。
    结论 一次性施用控释期约为90天的包膜控释氮肥显著降低了稻田苗期的田面水铵态氮含量,提升了分蘖—抽穗阶段的水稻氮素吸收,这种前氮后移的供氮模式提高了水稻产量和肥料利用率,总活性氮损失显著降低,因而具有良好的环境效应。一次性施用基质缓释氮肥提高了苗期稻田土壤的铵态氮含量,显著提高了水稻在分蘖—拔节阶段的氮素吸收,但是对水稻拔节—抽穗阶段的吸氮量没有显著影响。因此,基质缓释肥具有良好的增产效应,但环境正效应尚需提升。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives This study aimed to investigate the agronomic and environmental impacts of coated controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer and matrix slow-release nitrogen fertilizer in rice cultivation.
    Methods A field experiment was conducted on late-season rice in Jiujiang City, Jiangxi Province, including four treatments: conventional urea with one-time basal and one-time topdressing (U), single application of coated controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer (P), single application of matrix slow-release nitrogen fertilizer (M), and no nitrogen control (CK). following each nitrogen fertilizer application, ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emission fluxes were continuously monitored to calculate total gaseous nitrogen losses. Leachate samples were collected every 10 days after transplanting, and surface runoff samples were collected after each rainfall event to determine ammonium and nitrate concentrations, enabling the estimation of nitrogen losses via leaching and runoff. Soil samples from the 0−20 cm layer were collected at five key growth stages to determine ammonium and nitrate nitrogen content. Concurrently, plant samples were taken to assess biomass and nitrogen uptake. At maturity, rice yield and its contributing components were investigated.
    Results  Rice yields under P and M treatments increased by 29.3% and 30.2% compared with U, respectively, with nitrogen use efficiency improved by 20.6 and 17.8 percentage points. Compared to U, the P treatment significantly reduced ammonium nitrogen content in paddy fields during the seedling stage, and increased nitrogen accumulation in rice during the tillering−jointing and jointing−heading stages by 12.3% and 39.9%, respectively. It also markedly reduced ammonia volatilization by 33.4%, leaching losses by 12.3%, and runoff losses by 44.5%, resulting in a 33.6% reduction in total reactive nitrogen losses. In contrast, the M treatment increased nitrogen uptake by 109.3% during tillering−jointing stages and enhanced early nitrogen accumulation. It also reduced leaching losses by 16.5%, but increased runoff losses by 74.6% and total reactive nitrogen losses by 16.8%, compared to U.
    Conclusion A single application of coated controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer with an approximately 90 days release duration significantly reduced ammonium nitrogen content during the rice seedling stage and enhanced nitrogen uptake during the tillering to heading stage. This shift in nitrogen supply timing from earlier to later stages increased rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency, and reduced in total reactive nitrogen losses, thus offering positive environmental benefits. In contrast, a single application of matrix-based slow-release nitrogen fertilizer increased ammonium nitrogen content in paddy soil during the seedling stage and significantly boosted nitrogen uptake during the tillering to jointing stage, but had no significant effect on nitrogen uptake during the jointing to heading stage. Consequently, matrix slow-release fertilizers exhibit good yield-increasing effects but require improvement in their environmental performance.

     

/

返回文章
返回