• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

川中丘陵区不同耕作措施下小麦–玉米–红薯三熟制农田土壤呼吸及碳平衡特征

Characteristics of soil respiration and carbon balance in wheat-maize-sweet potato triple cropping system under different tillage practices in the hilly region of central Sichuan

  • 摘要:
    目的 小麦–玉米–红薯间套作模式是川中丘陵区旱地粮食生产的主要种植制度,曾占该区域旱三熟面积的60%以上。综合分析该种植模型下土壤呼吸与碳平衡特征,为构建川中丘陵区绿色低碳种植模式提供依据。
    方法 长期定位试验位于四川省农业科学院东部新区玉成综合试验基地,截至取样时已连续进行16年,种植制度为小麦–玉米–红薯间套作。试验设4个处理:秸秆不还田+翻耕+平作(对照,T1);翻耕+平作+秸秆覆盖还田(T2);翻耕+垄作+秸秆覆盖还田(T3);免耕+平作+秸秆覆盖还田(T4)。于2023年小麦生育期内监测土壤CO2排放速率与排放总量,评估农田系统固碳特征、碳足迹和碳平衡。
    结果 T1、T2、T3、T4处理小麦全生育期平均土壤呼吸速率分别为3.69、4.45、5.39和4.30 μmol/(m2·s),表现为T1<T4<T2<T3。小麦根区土壤呼吸速率以及小麦无根区土壤呼吸速率均随着小麦生长发育进程呈先下降后上升趋势,且与土壤温度变化显著相关。T2处理降低了小麦根区土壤呼吸与微生物呼吸对土壤温度的敏感性,T4处理降低了空闲带微生物呼吸对土壤温度的敏感性。T3处理小麦根区、非根区以及空闲带的土壤呼吸速率均最高且固碳量最低,其土壤呼吸总量(C 5225.78 kg/hm2)较T1显著提高43.8%,与其余处理无显著差异。各处理之间固碳量无显著差异。从碳足迹角度看,T1处理碳足迹最低,T1处理最高。从产量分析,T4处理显著大于T1处理,与其余处理无显著差异。单位产量碳足迹的高低顺序为T1>T3>T2>T4。从碳收支平衡角度看,T1处理下小麦种植带的土壤为碳源,其余处理均为碳汇;空闲带的土壤均为碳源。农田总碳汇能力以T3最低,T2与T4差异不显著,分别为T3的2.83、3.25倍。
    结论 在小麦整个生育期,秸秆还田条件下的小麦种植带土壤呈碳汇,空闲带呈碳源。虽然秸秆覆盖还田增加了小麦季农田生态系统的碳排放,但其提高了碳汇能力,属于净碳汇。相对翻耕,免耕降低了碳排放,增加了碳汇。垄作相比平作提高了碳排放并降低碳汇。在川中丘陵区小麦−玉米−红薯间套作模式下,小麦生产中采用免耕平作秸秆全程覆盖还田措施,可在增产的同时实现减排固碳,尽量避免采用翻耕+垄作+秸秆覆盖还田措施。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives Wheat-maize-sweet potato intercropping is a primary dryland grain production model in the hilly region of central Sichuan, once accounting for more than 60% of the dry triple cropping area in this region. We studied the carbon balance of farmland under different tillage methods, to provide a foundation for developing a green and low-carbon production model for the region.
    Methods A long-term field experiment was conducted in the Yucheng Comprehensive Experimental Base in the Eastern New District of Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Four treatments were setup during wheat season: plough+flat planting (T1), plough+flat planting+straw mulch (T2), plough+ridging+straw mulch (T3), no-tillage + flat planting+straw mulch (T4). The experiment had been ongoing for 16 years by 2023. During wheat growing period of the intercropping system, soil CO2 emission rate and total emission were monitored, and carbon sequestration, carbon footprint and carbon balance of farmland were assessed.
    Results The average soil respiration rates of T1, T2, T3 and T4 treatments were 3.69, 4.45, 5.39 and 4.30 μmol/(m2·s), respectively, following the order T1<T4<T2<T3. Soil respiration rate in both the root zone of wheat and non-root zone of wheat decreased initially and then increased with wheat growth and development. Correlation analysis revealed a significant relationship between soil respiration rate and soil temperature. T2 treatment reduced the sensitivity of soil respiration and microbial respiration to soil temperature in wheat root zone, and T4 treatment reduced the sensitivity of microbial respiration to soil temperature in fallow zone. Among the four treatments, T3 treatment had the highest soil respiration rate and the lowest carbon sequestration in the root zone, non-root zone and fallow zone of wheat. The total soil respiration (C 5225.78 kg/hm2) was significantly increased by 43.8 % compared with T1, and there was no significant difference with the other treatments. There was no significant difference in carbon sequestration among the treatments. From the perspective of carbon footprint, T4 treatment had the lowest carbon footprint, and T1 treatment had the highest carbon footprint. From the yield analysis, T4 treatment was significantly greater than T1 treatment, and there was no significant difference with the other treatments. The order of carbon footprint per unit yield was T1>T3>T2>T4. From the perspective of carbon balance, T1 treatment of wheat belt soil was carbon emission, and the other treatments were carbon sinks; the soil in the idle zone was carbon emission. The net carbon sequestration in T3 was the lowest, and the difference between T2 and T4 was not significant, which was 2.83 and 3.25 times that of T3, respectively.
    Conclusions During the whole growth period of wheat, soil in wheat belt under straw returning acted as carbon sink, and the idle belt exhibited carbon emission. Although straw mulching increased farmland ecosystem carbon emission in the wheat season, it increased the carbon sink capacity and belonged to a net carbon sink. Compared with tillage, no-tillage reduced carbon emissions and increased carbon sinks. Ridge tillage increased carbon emissions and reduced carbon sinks compared to flat tillage. Under the intercropping mode of wheat-maize-sweet potato in the hilly area of central Sichuan, wheat production can achieve emission reduction and carbon sequestration while increasing yield by using no-tillage flat tillage with straw mulching and returning to the field, and try to avoid the use of tillage + ridge tillage + straw mulching and returning to the field.

     

/

返回文章
返回