• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

川中丘陵区麦/玉/薯三熟制下不同耕作方式小麦季的农田系统碳平衡研究

Tillage methods effect farmland carbon dynamics during wheat season in central Sichuan’s sustainable wheat/maize/sweet potato triple cropping system

  • 摘要:
    目的 小麦/玉米/红薯间套作模式是川中丘陵区旱地粮食生产的主体种植体系,曾占该区域旱三熟面积的60%以上。本研究依托16年的长期定位试验,综合分析了该农田生态体系下土壤呼吸与碳平衡特征,为构建川中丘陵区绿色低碳种植模式打下基础。
    方法 长期径流场定位试验位于四川省农业科学院东部新区玉成综合试验基地,至取样时已连续进行了16年,种植制度为小麦/玉米/红薯间套作。定位试验有4个处理:秸秆不还田,翻耕后平作对照(T1);翻耕后平作+秸秆覆盖还田(T2);翻耕后垄作+秸秆覆盖还田(T3);免耕+平作+秸秆覆盖还田(T4)。2023年小麦生育期,监测了土壤CO2排放速率与排放总量,评估了农田系统固碳特征、碳足迹和碳平衡。
    结果 T1、T2、T3、T4处理小麦全生育期平均土壤呼吸速率分别为3.69、4.45、5.39和4.30 μmol/(m2·s),表现为T1<T4<T2<T3。小麦带根区土壤呼吸速率以及小麦带无根区土壤呼吸速率均随着小麦生长发育推移呈现先减后增的特点。相关性分析发现,该变化规律与土壤温度变化显著相关。T2处理降低了小麦根区土壤呼吸与微生物呼吸对土壤温度的敏感性,T4处理降低了空闲带微生物呼吸对土壤温度的敏感性。四个处理中,T3处理小麦根区、非根区以及空闲带的土壤呼吸通量均最高且固碳量最低,土壤呼吸总量(5225.78 CO2-eq kg/hm2)分别较T1、T2、T4高43.8%、19.9%和23.6%,固碳量(6954.30 kg C/hm2)分别较T1、T2、T4低0.93%%、17.77%、23.77%。从碳足迹角度看,T4处理碳足迹最低,T3处理的碳足迹最高。从产量分析,秸秆还田处理显著增加产量,免耕比翻耕处理产量更高。单位产量碳足迹的高低顺序为T1>T3>T2>T4。从碳收支平衡角度看,小麦带土壤T1处理为碳排,其余处理均为碳汇;空闲带土壤均为碳排。农田总碳汇T3最低,T2与T4差异不显著,分别为T3的2.32、2.05倍。
    结论 在小麦整个生育期,秸秆还田条件下的小麦带土壤呈碳汇,空闲带呈碳排。虽然秸秆覆盖还田增加了小麦季农田生态系统的碳排放,但其显著提高了碳汇能力,属于净碳汇。相对翻耕,免耕降低了碳排放,增加了碳汇。垄作相比平作显著提高了碳排放并降低碳汇。在川中丘陵区小麦/玉米/红薯间套作模式下,小麦生产采用免耕平作秸秆全程覆盖还田措施可在增产的同时,实现减排固碳,尽量避免采用翻耕+垄作+秸秆覆盖还田措施。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Wheat/maize/sweet potato intercropping is the main planting model of dryland grain production in the hilly region of central Sichuan, which once accounted for more than 60% of the area of dry triple cropping in this region. We studied the carbon balance situation of farmland under different tillage methods, to provide a foundation for choosing a green and low-carbon production model for the region.
    Methods The long-term positioning runoff field experiment was located in Yucheng Comprehensive Experimental Base in the Eastern New District of Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Four treatments were setup in wheat season, included plough+flat planting (T1), plough+flat planting+straw mulch (T2), plough+ridging+straw mulch (T3), no-tillage + flat planting+straw mulch (T4). The experiment had lasted 16 years when this research was carried out in 2023. During wheat growing period of the intercropping system, the soil CO2 emission rate and total emission were monitored, and the carbon sequestration, carbon footprint and carbon balance of farmland were assessed.
    Results The soil respiration rate during wheat season in T1, T2, T3 and T4 treatments were 3.69, 4.45, 5.39 and 4.30 μmol/(m2·s), respectively, showing order of T1 < T4 < T2 < T3. The soil respiration rate in the root zone and rootless zone of wheat belt decreased first and then increased with the growth and development of wheat, which were significantly correlated with soil temperature change. T2 treatment decreased the sensitivity of soil and microbial respiration to soil temperature in wheat belt, T4 treatment decreased the sensitivity of microbial respiration to soil temperature in fallow zone. Among all treatments, T3 treatment were recorded the highest soil CO2 flux and the lowest carbon sequestration. The total soil respiration (5225.78 kg/hm2) in T3 was 43.8%, 19.9% and 23.6% higher than T1, T2 and T4, respectively, and the carbon sequestration (6954.30 kg/hm2) was 0.93%%, 17.77% and 23.77% lower than T1, T2 and T4, respectively. Straw returning treatments (T2, T3, and T4) significantly increased wheat yield, relative to T1, and T4 was recorded the highest yield. In addition, T4 treatment exhibited the lowest, but T3 treatment exhibited the highest carbon footprint, with the carbon footprint per unit output in order of T1>T3>T2>T4. The wheat belt in T1 treatment was carbon emission, while in the other three treatments were carbon sinks, and the fallow belt were all carbon emission. The total carbon sinks in farmland of T2 and T4 treatments were comparable, and were 2.32 and 2.05 times of that in T3, respectively.
    Conclusion During the whole growth period of wheat, the wheat belt soil are carbon sink and the fallow belt soil are carbon emission. Straw mulching will increase the carbon emission of farmland, but the significantly improved carbon sequestration offset the emission, and the carbon balance shows net sequestration. No-tillage reduces carbon emission and the balance is carbon sink. Compared with flat planting, ridge planting significantly increases carbon emission and reduces carbon sink, resulting in net carbon emission in farmland system. The tillage package of no-tillage and flat planting plus straw mulching is recommended as the high yield, reduced carbon emission and enhanced carbon sequestration, while the ridge plant should be less used.

     

/

返回文章
返回