• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

水改旱后红壤酸化的驱动因子及调控措施评估

Driving factors of acidification during paddy-to-upland conversion and the remediation effects of amendments

  • 摘要:
    目的 探究红壤丘陵区水稻土改旱地后土壤酸化特征及主要驱动因素,并筛选适宜的调控措施,为区域酸化防控提供理论依据。
    方法 采用室内培养实验,研究花岗岩和砂页岩发育的水稻土在两个水分梯度下土壤酸化及元素转化特征。共设置10个处理:淹水 (35%,w/w)不施氮 (W)和施氮 (WN);水改旱 (15%,w/w)不施氮 (D)和施氮 (DN);在水改旱施氮基础上,添加石灰 (DNL)、硝化抑制剂DCD (DNF)、石灰+秸秆 (DNS)、石灰+DCD (DNT)、石灰+DCD+秸秆 (DNP)、生物炭 (DNC)。分析土壤pH、无机氮、SO42−、Mn2+、Fe2+、交换性酸、铝和交换性盐基离子含量变化及其相关关系。
    结果 不施氮条件下,D处理花岗岩和砂页岩发育水稻土pH分别较W处理降低2.49和1.99个单位,交换性铝含量分别增加0.26和0.10 cmol(+)/kg,硝态氮含量分别增加53.57和117.70 mg/kg。施氮条件下,DN处理花岗岩和砂页岩发育的水稻土较WN处理pH分别下降2.57和2.49个单位,交换性铝含量分别增加0.42和0.13 cmol(+)/kg,硝态氮含量分别增加113.24和213.47 mg/kg。与DN处理相比,DNT、DNP、DNF、DNL、DNS和DNC处理均显著提高了花岗岩和砂页岩发育的土壤pH,以DNT处理提升效果最好,提升了2.88和3.25个单位,其次为DNP、DNF、DNL、DNS和DNC处理,分别提高了1.67和2.93、0.86和1.56、0.48和0.87、0.15和0.69、0.16和0.08个单位;DNL、DNF、DNS、DNT、DNP和DNC处理土壤交换性铝含量分别降低了0.77和0.40、0.29和0.30、0.78和0.40、0.76和0.40、0.71和0.20、0.60和0.22 cmol(+)/kg;DNF、DNT和DNP处理土壤硝态氮含量降低了61.17和143.10、101.04和129.00、80.75和183.52 mg/kg,DNL、DNS、和DNC处理则显著增加;DNL、DNS、DNT和DNP处理交换性钙含量分别提高了2.99和3.29、1.92和2.15、2.98和3.25、1.78和1.86 cmol(+)/kg。花岗岩和砂页岩发育的土壤DN处理的元素转化质子产量较W处理分别增加了7.34和7.16 cmol(+)/kg,其中,铁氧化产生质子占花岗岩发育土壤元素转化质子产量的50.44%,硫氧化产生质子占砂页岩发育土壤元素转化质子产量的62.16%。与DN处理相比,DNF、DNT和DNP处理降低花岗岩和砂页岩发育的土壤质子产生量,分别降低了3.64和3.26、2.66和5.44、3.41和3.08 cmol(+)/kg,DNL、DNS和DNC处理则分别降低了0.10和0.71、1.92和0.59和3.24和1.37 cmol(+)/kg。相关性分析表明,土壤pH与铵态氮、亚铁含量呈显著正相关,与硝态氮、硫酸根含量呈显著负相关。随机森林模型表明铁和硫氧化产生质子对水改旱后质子产生量的贡献最大。
    结论 两种母质发育的水稻土改旱后土壤酸化加剧,铁和硫氧化产生质子是导致土壤酸化的主要原因,其次是氮硝化作用产生质子。石灰+硝化抑制剂是缓解水改旱土壤酸化的有效措施之一。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives The conversion of paddy field to upland is accompanied by acidification. We studied the main driving factors and suitable amendments to provide the soil from acidification.
    Methods Incubation method was used for the study, with two test paddy soils that are developed from granite and sand shale, respectively. The treatments composed of flooding condition (water content 35%, w/w) without and with N application (W, WN), and aerobic condition to simulate paddy to dry land conversion (15%, w/w) without and with N application (D, DN); Under DN, amendments were added to make treatments of lime (DNL), nitrification inhibitor DCD (DNF), lime + straw (DNS), lime + DCD (DNT), lime + DCD + straw (DNP), and biochar (DNC). The pH, NO3, available S, Mn2+, Fe2+, exchangeable acid and Al, and exchangeable base cations were measured during the incubation period.
    Results Compared with W treatment, D treatment decreased soil pH by 2.49 and 1.99 units, increased exchangeable Al by 0.26 and 0.10 cmol(+)/kg, and NO3 by 53.57 and 117.70 mg/kg, respectively. Compared with WN treatment, DN treatment decreased soil pH by 2.57 and 2.49 units, increased exchangeable Al by 0.42 and 0.13 cmol(+)/kg and NO3 by 113.24 and 213.47 mg/kg, respectively. Compared with the DN treatment, DNT treatment was the most effective in enhancing pH by 2.88 and 3.25 units, followed by the DNP, DNF, DNL, DNS, and DNC treatments with the increased pH by 1.67 and 2.93, 0.86 and 1.56, 0.48 and 0.87, 0.15 and 0.69, 0.16 and 0.08 units for the soils derived from granite and sand shale, respectively; The DNL, DNF, DNS, DNT, DNP, and DNC treatments reduced soil exchangeable Al by 0.77 and 0.40, 0.29 and 0.30, 0.78 and 0.40, 0.76 and 0.40, 0.71 and 0.20, 0.60 and 0.22 cmol(+)/kg, respectively; DNF, DNT and DNP treatments decreased soil NO3 by 61.17 and 143.10 mg/kg, 101.04 and 129.00 mg/kg, 80.75 and 183.52 mg/kg, respectively, while DNL, DNS and DNC treatments increased soil NO3 significantly. Compared with DN, DNL, DNS, DNT and DNP treatments increased the exchangeable Ca of two soils by 2.99 and 3.29,1.92 and 2.15,2.98 and 3.25, 1.78 and 1.86 cmol(+)/kg, respectively. During the conversion, the proton production of the two soils in DN treatment was increased by 7.34 and 7.16 cmol(+)/kg, relative to W treatment, and Fe2+ oxidation contributed 50.44% of the proton production in granite derived soil, and sulfur oxidation contributed 62.16% of the proton production in sand shale derived soil. Compared with DN, DNF, DNT, and DNP treatments reduced the proton production in granite and sand shale derived soils by 3.64 and 3.26, 2.66, and 5.44, 3.41 and 3.08 cmol(+)/kg, respectively, while DNL, DNS, and DNC treatments did not exhibit significant reduction effect. Correlation analysis showed that soil pH was positively correlated with NH4+ and Fe2+ content, and negatively correlated with NO3 and S content. The random forest model showed that the protons produced by iron and sulfur oxidation contribute the most to the proton production during change from paddy to upland.
    Conclusions Nitrogen application will intensify the soil acidification during converting from paddy fields to uplands. The oxidation of iron and sulfur is the main factors driving the acidification by contributing predominant protons. The together application of lime and nitrification inhibitor is an effective measures to alleviate soil acidification.

     

/

返回文章
返回