• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

菌根类型与环境因子驱动中国森林土壤酶活性分异

Divergent soil enzyme activities in forest soils driven by mycorrhizal types and environmental factors

  • 摘要:
    目的 为阐明菌根类型对森林土壤酶活性的影响,利用中国森林土壤酶活性数据库,探究丛枝菌根(AM)和外生菌根(ECM)森林土壤酶活性的差异及其环境调控机制。
    方法 基于中国森林样地土壤酶活性及相关因素调查数据库,并以“土壤酶、酶活性和森林”为关键词,利用谷歌学术检索补充了2017—2025年的相关数据,共获得701个样本。根据优势物种所属菌根类型将林地样本分为AM型和ECM型,选择其中290个仅具有AM型和296个仅具有ECM型菌根的林地样本进行研究。运用SPSS26.0等软件计算了不同菌根类型森林土壤酶活性的差异,结合环境因子进行回归分析并构建偏最小二乘路径模型。
    结果 AM型森林土壤中蔗糖酶(INV)、酸性(碱性)磷酸酶(AP)活性分别为10753 μg/(g·2 h)、591 μg/(g·2 h),显著高于ECM型森林的5444 μg/(g·2 h)、280 μg/(g·2 h),而AM型森林土壤中脲酶(URE)活性为426 μg/(g·d),显著低于ECM型森林的745 μg/(g·d)。影响森林土壤酶活性的土壤因子包括土壤深度、pH及土壤有机质(SOM),气候因子包括年均温、年降水、海拔。AM森林土壤INV、AP、蛋白酶(PRO)活性和ECM森林土壤的PRO活性主要受到土壤因子的调控。INV酶活性在AM森林中随土壤深度的增加而降低,而在ECM森林中随土壤深度的增加而升高。
    结论 菌根类型影响土壤酶活性,AM森林土壤的INV、AP酶活性高,而ECM森林土壤中的URE酶活性高。环境因子对酶活性的调控作用存在菌根依赖性,AM森林土壤INV、AP、PRO活性和ECM森林土壤的PRO活性主要受到土壤因子的调控,而AM森林中CAT活性则主要受气候因子影响。土壤酶活性对环境梯度的响应也因菌根类型而异,INV活性在AM森林中随土壤深度增加而降低,而在ECM森林中呈相反趋势;AP活性在AM森林中随pH升高而降低,而在ECM森林中随SOM的增加而升高。ECM型森林土壤酶活性受环境因子的调控路径比AM型森林更复杂。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective In order to elucidate the influence of mycorrhizal types on forest soil enzyme activity, this study investigated the differences in soil enzyme activities and the environmental regulatory mechanisms between the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) types of forests in China.
    Methods The data before 2017 were from the Database of Soil Enzyme Activity and Related Factors in Chinese Forest Plots, and the data from 2017 to 2025 was obtained through Google Scholar searches using the keywords “soil enzymes, enzyme activity, and forests”, the data covered a total of 701 forest samples. Based on the mycorrhizal type of the dominant species, 290 forests exclusively featured AM-type and 296 forests exclusively featured ECM-type mycorrhizae. Differences in soil enzyme activity between the two mycorrhizal forest types were calculated using software such as SPSS 26.0. Regression analysis was performed to study the relationship of enzyme activities with environmental factors, and a partial least squares path model was constructed.
    Results In AM-type forest soils, invertase (INV) and acid (or alkaline) phosphatase (AP) activities were 10753 μg/(g·2 h) and 591 μg/(g·2 h), respectively, significantly higher than the 5444 μg/(g·2 h) and 280 μg/(g·2 h) observed in ECM-type forests. While urease (URE) activity in AM-type forest soil was 426 μg/(g·d), significantly lower than the 745 μg/(g·d) in ECM-type forest soil. The soil factors influencing forest soil enzyme activity include soil depth, pH, and soil organic matter (SOM), and the climatic factors were mean annual temperature, mean annual precipitation, and altitude. The activities of INV, AP, and protease (PRO) in AM-type forest soil as well as the activity of PRO in ECM-type forest soil were primarily regulated by soil factors. The INV enzyme activity decreased with the increasing of soil depth in AM forests, whereas it increased with increasing soil depth in ECM forests.
    Conclusion Mycorrhizal type can influence soil enzyme activities. AM-type forest soils exhibit high INV and AP activities, whereas ECM-type forest soils dominated show high URE activity. The regulatory effects of environmental factors on enzyme activities are mycorrhizal-dependent. The activities of INV, AP, and protease (PRO) in AM-type forest soils, as well as PRO activity in ECM-type forest soils, are primarily regulated by soil factors. In contrast, CAT activity in AM-type forests is mainly influenced by climatic factors. The responses of soil enzyme activities to environmental gradients also vary with mycorrhizal type. INV activity decreases with increasing soil depth in AM forests, while showing an opposite trend in ECM forests. AP activity decreases with rising pH in AM forests, whereas it increases with the augmentation of SOM in ECM forests. The regulatory pathways of environmental factors on soil enzyme activities in ECM forests are more complex than those in AM forests.

     

/

返回文章
返回