• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

基于最小数据集的新疆吐鲁番市甜瓜田土壤健康评价

Evaluations of soil health of melon field in Turpan City of Xinjiang based on minimum data set

  • 摘要:
    目的 开展土壤健康评价不仅可以了解甜瓜田土壤健康状况,也可以精准识别土壤障碍因子,为甜瓜田健康土壤培育提供重要理论支撑。本研究通过建立土壤健康评价数据库并构建最小数据集 (minimum data set,MDS),系统评价吐鲁番市甜瓜田的土壤健康状况。
    方法 在新疆吐鲁番市吐峪沟乡、亚尔镇、三堡乡的甜瓜田里,选择种植年限平均为5年的72个甜瓜地块,采集0—20 cm土层土壤样品,测定了28项土壤物理、化学和生物学指标,建立了土壤健康评价数据库。利用主成分分析构建最小数据集,运用线性和非线性评分函数进行土壤健康评价,并通过全数据集 (total data set,TDS)对最小数据集的评价结果进行了验证。
    结果 经主成分分析法筛选出容重、电导率、有效磷、有机碳、交换性钙、土壤呼吸和β-葡萄糖苷酶7个指标,建立了土壤健康评价最小数据集。采用线性评分函数法,基于全数据集和最小数据集计算的土壤健康指数分别为0.44和0.49,变异系数分别为22.5%和18.7%;采用非线性评分函数法,土壤健康指数平均值分别为0.46和0.47,变异系数分别为25.8%和24.3%。基于全数据集和最小数据集计算的土壤健康指数间均呈显著正相关 (P<0.01),斜率接近0.9。整体上,吐峪沟乡和亚尔镇甜瓜田土壤健康指数均高于三堡乡。
    结论 最小数据集可以代替全数据集用于甜瓜田土壤健康评价,非线性评分函数计算的土壤健康指数变异系数大,说明非线性评分函数更加敏感,建议选择非线性评分函数用于甜瓜田土壤健康评价。新疆吐鲁番市甜瓜田土壤pH为碱性,土壤养分含量处于丰富水平,但有机质和活性碳含量较低。经最小数据集评价,吐鲁番甜瓜田土壤健康指数在0.5以下,处于中等水平。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives Evaluation of soil health is an effective measurement for identifying the soil health status and main soil obstacle factors of melon fields, which provides important theoretical support for the cultivation of healthy soil. This study established the soil health assessment database and evaluated the soil health index of melon fields by constructing a minimum data set (MDS) in Turpan City, Xinjiang.
    Methods A total of 72 soil samples were collected in the tillage layer of melon fields in Tuyugou, Ya’er, and Sanbao towns, Turpan City in Xinjiang, all the tested fields had planted melon for averaged 5 years. Twenty-eight soil physical, chemical, and biological properties were analyzed as the health indicators. A soil health assessment database was established, and the minimum data set (MDS) was constructed using principal component analysis. Linear and non-linear soil health assessment methods were used for evaluation. The total data set (TDS) was used for verification.
    Results Seven indicators were selected for the MDS by the principal component analysis, including the soil bulk density, electrical conductivity, available phosphorus, organic carbon, exchangeable calcium, soil respiration, and β-glucosidase. For the linear scoring function, the soil health indices calculated based on the TDS and MDS were 0.44 and 0.49, respectively, with coefficients of variation of 22.5% and 18.7% correspondingly. For the non-linear scoring function, the average soil health indices calculated based on the TDS and MDS were 0.46 and 0.47, respectively, while the coefficients of variation were 25.8% and 24.3% in that order. Using linear and non-linear evaluation methods, there was a significant positive correlation between the soil health index calculated based on the TDS and MDS (P<0.01). The slope is close to 0.9. Overall, the soil health index of Tuyugou and Ya’er Town was higher than that of Sanbao Town.
    Conclusions The MDS can be used as a substitute for the TDS in assessing soil health in melon fields. The large coefficient of variation of the soil health indices calculated by the nonlinear scoring function indicates that the nonlinear scoring function is more sensitive. Therefore, it is recommended to select the nonlinear scoring function for soil health evaluation of melon fields. The melon field in Turpan City, Xinjiang, is alkaline in terms of pH, with rich soil nutrient content, but relatively low organic matter and active carbon. According to the assessment of MDS, the soil health index in Turpan is bellow 0.5, indicating a moderate level of health.

     

/

返回文章
返回