• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

主要土壤酸改良剂提升作物产量和氮肥偏生产力的适宜条件研究

Suitable conditions for major soil amendments to enhance crop yield and nitrogen partial factor productivity

  • 摘要:
    目的 评估生物炭、石灰及有机肥的酸化土壤修复效能,解析气候-土壤-管理措施的互作机制,为区域精准治理提供依据。
    方法 以“土壤酸改良剂或石灰或生物炭或有机肥”和“土壤pH或酸化或产量”为关键词,在Google Scholar、Web of Sci Science和CNKI数据库检索了2000—2024年的出版文献,然后按照以下标准进行了筛选:田间试验;粮食作物(水稻、小麦、玉米);土壤酸改良剂;涵盖改良后的土壤pH或作物产量结果;施氮量;有机肥含氮量,最终,筛选到749篇文献,1425对土壤pH数据,1802对作物产量数据,748对氮肥偏生产力数据,并提取了气候和土壤性质数据。采用Meta分析法量化了三种土壤酸改良剂提高土壤pH、作物产量和氮肥偏生产力的效果。采用亚组分析和相关性分析探索气候和土壤因素对土壤酸改良剂的影响,以确定各土壤酸改良剂的适宜施用条件。
    结果和结论 全球范围内,土壤酸改良剂施用显著提高土壤pH、作物产量和氮肥偏生产力,石灰平均为14.30%、24.40%和44.00%,生物炭平均为4.20%、18.20%和8.48%,有机肥平均为3.70%、22.30%和6.34%。石灰在年均温大于16℃及初始有机碳小于12 g/kg的粗质地强酸性土壤(pH≤5.5)中的控酸效果较好,生物炭在年均温大于16℃、中等质地的强酸性土壤效果较好,有机肥在年降雨大于1200 mm和年均温大于16℃的中等质地弱酸性土壤施用效果较好。石灰、生物炭和有机肥均为缓解土壤酸化、提高作物产量和氮肥偏生产力的有效措施,其中石灰具有最快、最显著的改善效果,生物炭具有最稳定的提升效果,有机肥能长期调控作物产量,并具有最广泛的施用情景,且CaO类石灰、壳渣类生物炭、秸秆类有机肥在三类措施中效果最优。在实际应用中,应根据土壤初始酸度、土壤有机碳含量及当地气候条件,合理选择和调整各防控措施的施用量及持续时间,从而实现土壤酸化的科学调控。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of biochar, lime, and organic fertilizer in ameliorating soil acidification and to elucidate the interplay among climate, soil properties, and management practices. The findings are expected to provide a scientific basis for developing region-specific remediation strategies.
    Methods Based on keywords including “soil amendment or lime or biochar or organic fertilizer” and “soil pH or acidification or yield”, we searched publications from 2000 to 2024 across Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the CNKI database. The selection process applied the following criteria: field experiments; staple food crops (rice, wheat, maize); application of soil acid amendments; reported outcomes on soil pH change or crop yield; availability of nitrogen application rate; and nitrogen content in organic fertilizers. A total of 749 articles were selected, yielding 1425 data pairs for soil pH, 1802 for crop yield, and 748 for the partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN). Data on climate and soil properties were also extracted. A Meta-analysis was performed to quantify the effects of the three soil amendments on soil pH, crop yield, and PFPN. Subgroup and correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate how climatic and soil factors influence amendment efficacy, with the goal of identifying suitable application conditions for each amendment type.
    Results and Conclusion  Globally, the application of soil amendments significantly improved soil pH, grain yield, and PFPN. Lime application increased these parameters by an average of 14.30%, 24.40%, and 44.00%, respectively. Biochar resulted in increases of 4.20%, 18.20%, and 8.48%, while organic fertilizer led to gains of 3.70%, 22.30%, and 6.34%. Subgroup analysis revealed that lime was most effective in coarsely-textured, strongly acidic soils (pH≤5.5) under a mean annual temperature (MAT) > 16 °C and initial organic carbon content < 12 g/kg. Biochar performed optimally in medium-textured, strongly acidic soils under MAT>16 °C, while organic fertilizer was most beneficial in medium-textured, slightly acidic soils under MAT>16 °C and annual precipitation >1200 mm. Lime, biochar, and organic fertilizer are all effective in mitigating soil acidification, increasing crop yield, and enhancing PFPN. Among them, lime exhibits the most rapid and pronounced effects, biochar provides the most consistent improvements, and organic fertilizer offers sustained yield regulation across the broadest application scenarios. Specifically, CaO-based lime, shell-derived biochar, and straw-based organic fertilizer were identified as the most effective forms within each category. For practical application, the selection, application rate, and duration of these amendments should be strategically adjusted based on initial soil acidity, soil organic carbon content, and local climate conditions, enabling scientifically informed and precise management of soil acidification.

     

/

返回文章
返回