• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

秸秆秋季湿耙还田或者春季炭化还田是提高寒地粳稻产量及氮素利用率的适宜方式

Returning straw in autumn alongside wet harrowing or applying it as biochar in spring enhance grain yield and nitrogen utilization of japonica rice in northern cold regions

  • 摘要:
    目的 秸秆还田是有效的土壤培肥技术,但还田方式显著影响着水稻的穗性状、产量及氮素吸收利用。我们研究了北方寒地水稻秸秆的适宜还田方式,为合理秸秆资源利用和水稻增产增效提供技术支撑。
    方法 2022、2023年,以中晚熟粳稻品种‘北粳1501’为材料,在沈阳农业大学进行了田间试验。设置秸秆不还田(CK)、春季常规还田(ST)、秋季湿耙还田(SW)及春季炭化还田(SC)4个处理,测定水稻产量、关键生育期一、二次枝梗性状、各器官干物质重、净光合速率、叶面积指数、各器官氮素积累量及氮素利用效率等指标,分析产量与干物质积累和氮素吸收利用的关系。
    结果 SC和SW处理在保证一定穗数的前提下提高了穗粒数、优化了二次枝梗性状,两者产量均显著高于ST,而ST处理的水稻产量与CK相当。两年中,SC和SW处理在齐穗期和灌浆期叶片净光合速率均高于ST,而ST低于CK。SW和SC处理提高了水稻成熟期干物质和氮素积累总量,而ST处理低于CK。此外,SC和SW提高了水稻氮素吸收利用率、农学利用率、偏生产力及土壤氮素依存率,且多在SC处理下达最高。相关性分析及主成分分析均表明,水稻成熟期干物质积累总量、氮素吸收利用率、偏生产力与产量呈极显著正相关。
    结论 秸秆秋季湿耙还田和炭化还田均提升水稻光合效率,增加成熟期干物质与氮素积累量,从而提高氮素利用率并促进水稻增产。而秸秆春季还田会降低寒地水稻氮素吸收能力,增加减产的风险。因此,春季炭化还田和秋季结合湿耙秸秆还田是北方寒地粳稻丰产及秸秆高效利用的适宜途径。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives Straw return is an effective practice for improving soil fertility, but the return methods markedly influence rice panicle traits, grain yield, and nitrogen use efficiency. We investigated the suitable methods of straw return for rice in the northern cold region, thereby providing technical support for the rational utilization of straw resources and for increasing rice yield and improving production efficiency.
    Methods Field experiments were carried out in Shenyang Agricultural University in 2022 and 2023, using a medium-late maturing japonica rice cultivar 'Beijing 1501' as the test material. Four treatments were established: no straw return (CK), straw return in spring (ST), straw return in autumn with wet harrowing (SW), and rice straw biochar return in spring (SC). Rice grain yield, primary and secondary panicle branch traits, dry matter weight of each organ, net photosynthetic rate, leaf area index, N accumulation in different organs, and N use efficiency at the key growth stages were measured, and the relationships between grain yield and dry matter accumulation as well as N uptake and utilization were analyzed.
    Results The SC and SW treatments, while maintaining a certain panicle number, increased spikelets per panicle and improved secondary panicle branch traits; yield under SC and SW were both significantly higher than under ST, whereas the yield under ST was comparable to that under the CK. In both years, the SC and SW treatments showed higher net photosynthetic rates at the full heading and filling stages than the ST treatment, whereas the ST treatment showed lower values than CK. The SW and SC treatments increased total dry matter and total N accumulation at maturity, whereas the ST treatment was lower than CK. Furthermore, the SC and SW treatments enhanced N recovery efficiency, agronomic efficiency, partial factor productivity, and soil N dependence rate, with most of these indices attaining their highest values under SC. Both correlation analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that total dry matter accumulation at maturity, N recovery efficiency, and N partial factor productivity were highly significantly and positively correlated with yield.
    Conclusions Both straw return in autumn with wet harrowing and applying rice straw as biochar enhanced rice photosynthetic efficiency, dry matter, and N accumulation at maturity, thereby promoting rice yield and N use efficiency. By contrast, straw return in spring reduced the rice N uptake capacity and increased the risk of yield loss. Therefore, return straw in autumn coupled with wet harrowing, or applying straw as biochar in spring are suitable methods of achieving high yields of japonica rice in northern cold regions and for the efficient utilization of straw.

     

/

返回文章
返回