• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

东北黑土区玉米秸秆氮钾养分替代化肥潜力研究

Substitution potentials of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers with maize straw in mollisols of northeast China

  • 摘要:
    目的 秸秆是重要的养分资源,但在养分管理中较少考虑秸秆还田带入土壤的养分的作物有效性。研究秸秆养分替代化肥养分的潜力及年际变化规律,以实现更加科学精准的化肥运筹和土地的可持续利用。
    方法 2022—2024年,在黑龙江省哈尔滨市闫家岗农场的典型黑土农田上,连续开展了3年秸秆还田养分替代潜力田间定位试验,供试作物为玉米。试验以养分专家系统推荐的化肥用量为基础处理(秸秆全部还田,NE),设置秸秆氮 (N)、钾 (K)分别以25%、50%、75%和100%的有效性假定替代化肥氮、钾的处理。同时设置NE基础上不施氮或钾肥(NE-N、NE-K)处理,以农民习惯施肥FP处理作为对照。每年收获期测定玉米产量、植株养分含量和0—60 cm土层土壤肥力指标。
    结果 虽然FP处理的化肥总量(N+P2O5+K2O)较NE多36.1%,由于没有秸秆还田,其产量低于NE处理,土壤3年累积分别亏缺N 10.1 kg/hm2和K 117.8 kg/hm2,40 cm以下土壤氮素累积增加30.8%,存在土壤氮素淋失风险。与NE相比,秸秆氮替代氮肥处理(NE-50%SN、NE-75%SN和NE-100%SN处理)没有显著影响玉米产量,NE-75%SN和NE-100%SN处理提高了氮肥利用率和偏生产力,但土壤3年累积亏缺N 18.8和N 29.3 kg/hm2,而NE处理3年土壤累积N素盈余22.6 kg/hm2;NE-100%SN处理表层土壤矿质氮含量较NE显著减少58.4%,其余处理之间以及与NE之间表层土壤矿质氮含量差异未达到显著水平,但各替代比例处理矿质氮减少了向深层土壤的淋洗。与NE相比,秸秆钾替代钾肥处理(NE-25%SK、NE-50%SK、NE-75%SK和NE-100%SK处理)中,玉米产量无显著变化,NE-75%SK和NE-100%SK处理提高了钾肥偏生产力,而3年土壤累积K亏缺量分别为12.4和36.8 kg/hm2,NE处理3年土壤累积钾盈余65.6 kg/hm2;NE-25%SK、NE-50%SK、NE-75%SK和NE-100%SK替代比例处理较NE土壤速效钾含量平均分别显著降低21.9%、15.6%、14.5%和13.8%,而各替代比例之间无显著差异;替代处理NE-100%SK、NE-75%SK和NE-50%SK较NE处理表层土壤缓效钾含量分别显著降低31.2%、26.4%和20.9%,各处理缓效钾含量差异随土层深度的增加而降低。
    结论 连续3年在养分专家系统(NE)推荐的化肥施用量基础上减去相当于全部秸秆还田带入的氮素、钾素量,未导致玉米产量的明显降低,同时大幅提升了氮肥和钾肥的利用率和偏生产力,减少了氮和钾向深层土壤的移动。但当氮、钾减施量超过秸秆氮、钾量的一半时,土壤氮素和钾素表观平衡处于亏缺状态,所以不推荐长期大幅度使用秸秆氮、钾替代化肥相应养分,具体替代尺度还需进一步研究。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives Straws contain large amount of nutrients, yet the crop availability of nutrients incorporated into the soil through straw incorporation is rarely considered in nutrient management practices. We studied the potential of replacing chemical fertilizers with straw nutrients and the annual variation patterns, aims to achieve more scientific and precise fertilizer management and sustainable land use.
    Methods From 2022 to 2024, a three-year field trial was conducted at Yanjia Gang Farm in Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, where was typical black soil farmland region, and the test crop was maize. In the experiment, the chemical fertilizer application rate recommended by the Nutrient Expert system (with full straw incorporation, NE) was set as the basic treatment. Treatments with straw-derived nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) replacing 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of chemical fertilizer N and K, respectively, were established and designated as NE-50%SN, NE-75%SN, NE-100%SN, as well as NE-25%SK, NE-50%SK, NE-75%SK and NE-100%SK. Additionally, treatments without N or K fertilizer respectively on the basis of NE (NE-N, NE-K) were established for calculating relevant indicators, and local farmer’s practice (FP) serving as the no straw return control at the same time. maize yield, plant nutrient content, and soil fertility indicators at the 0−60 cm depth were measured annually at harvest.
    Results Compared with the NE treatment, the FP treatment applied 36.1% extra chemical fertilizers (N+P2O5+K2O), however, reduced maize yield, leading to accumulated deficits of N 10.1 kg/hm2 and K 117.8 kg/hm2 in the soil, and 30.8% higher nitrogen accumulation in the soil profile below 40 cm, indicating a risk of soil nitrogen leaching. Compared to NE, straw nitrogen substitution treatments (NE-50%SN, NE-75%SN, and NE-100%SN) did not significantly affect maize yield, NE-75%SN and NE-100%SN improved nitrogen fertilizer utilization rate and partial factor productivity, but resulted in accumulated N deficits of 18.8 and 29.3 kg/hm2 over three years, while NE treatments achieved a cumulative N surplus of up to 22.6 kg/hm2 over the three years. The NE-100%SN treatment significantly reduced mineral nitrogen content by 58.4% compared to NE, with no significant differences among other treatments. All substitution ratio treatments reduced mineral nitrogen leaching into deeper soil layers. Compared to NE, maize yield showed no significant changes in straw potassium substitution treatments (NE-25%SK, NE-50%SK, NE-75%SK, and NE-100%SK). The NE-75%SK and NE-100%SK treatments enhanced partial factor productivity of potassium, while accumulating deficits of K 12.4 and K 36.8 kg/hm2 over three years. The NE treatment achieved the highest cumulative K surplus of 65.6 kg/hm2 over three years. Compared to NE soil, NE-25%SK, NE-50%SK, NE-75%SK and NE-100%SK substitution ratio treatments significantly reduced available potassium content by 21.9%, 15.6%, 14.5%, and 13.8%, respectively, with no significant differences among substitution ratio treatments. NE-100%SK, NE-75%SK, and NE-50%SK reduced slowly available potassium content by 31.2%, 26.4%, and 20.9% compared to NE in soil, respectively. Differences among treatments significantly decreased with increasing soil depth.
    Conclusions During the three-year experimental period, even subtracting the nitrogen and potassium amounts equivalent to those introduced by complete straw return from the chemical fertilizer application rates recommended by the Nutrient Expert system (NE) did not lead to a significant reduction in maize yield. At the same time, it substantially increased the nitrogen and potassium fertilizer utilization efficiency and partial factor productivity, while reducing the leaching of nitrogen and potassium into deeper soil layers. However, from the perspective of soil nutrient apparent balance, when the reduction in nitrogen and potassium fertilizer application exceeded half of the nitrogen and potassium supplied by straw, the soil nitrogen and potassium levels showed a deficit state. Therefore, it is not recommended to replace chemical fertilizers with straw nitrogen/potassium on a large scale over the long term. The appropriate substitution scale requires further research.

     

/

返回文章
返回