• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

谷子和鹰嘴豆生长及磷活化策略对不同土壤磷水平的响应

The growth responses and phosphorus mobilization strategies of foxtail millet and chickpea to different soil phosphorus levels

  • 摘要:
    目的 禾本科与豆科作物在磷利用策略上存在巨大差异,深入了解二者面对不同磷水平时的响应策略对提高作物磷利用效率至关重要。因此,本研究比较了代表性禾本科和豆科作物在不同磷供应水平下的生长响应特征及根际磷活化策略。
    方法 以禾本科作物谷子(Setaria italica)和豆科作物鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum)为试材进行了温室盆栽试验。选用低磷土壤作为背景土,设置6个KH2PO4添加水平:0、10、25、50、100、200 P mg/kg土壤,形成从严重缺磷到磷素充足的连续磷供应梯度。谷子在播种后38天收获(抽穗期),鹰嘴豆在播种后60天收获(开花期)。测定并分析作物的地上部和地下部生物量、根冠比,采集根际土壤测定pH、酸性磷酸酶活性、有机酸阴离子含量。
    结果 两种作物对土壤磷水平的响应存在显著差异。谷子对土壤磷水平极其敏感,随着施磷量增加,其地上部生物量呈指数级增长,最大增幅为140倍;而鹰嘴豆对土壤磷水平响应相对平缓,生物量仅呈线性缓慢增长,最大增幅为40%。在低磷胁迫下(P0-P25),谷子通过分泌有机酸来酸化根际土壤,P0和P10处理pH显著低于其他P梯度处理。在低磷条件下(P0-P25),谷子根际总有机酸阴离子含量均维持在4000 nmol/(g, soil)以上,比鹰嘴豆高约279倍,但在高磷条件下(P50-P200),谷子根际土壤中总有机酸阴离子含量急剧下降到20 nmol/(g, soil)以下。而鹰嘴豆的根际pH和有机酸阴离子分泌量在所有磷水平处理间均无显著变化,表现出相对“迟钝”的根际化学调控特征。
    结论 谷子采用“敏感型”,而鹰嘴豆则表现出“保守型”根际磷活化策略来应对土壤磷素水平的变化。谷子在低磷时会通过分泌大量有机酸阴离子和质子来活化土壤磷,一旦外部磷供应充足,便立即减少有机酸阴离子分泌,同时吸收大量的土壤磷实现爆发式生长。而鹰嘴豆对土壤磷供应的变化不敏感,其生长策略更侧重于维持体内磷浓度的稳定,具有更强的耐低磷胁迫能力,施用磷肥也不会显著提升生物量的积累。因此,提高磷肥的效率需充分考虑作物的磷利用策略。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives Significant differences exist in phosphorus (P) utilization strategies between gramineous and leguminous crops. An in-depth understanding of how these crops respond to different phosphorus levels is crucial for improving phosphorus use efficiency. Therefore, this study compared the growth response characteristics and rhizosphere phosphorus activation strategies of representative gramineous and leguminous crops under different phosphorus supply levels.
    Methods A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted using foxtail millet (Setaria italica), a gramineous crop, and chickpea (Cicer arietinum), a leguminous crop, as test materials. Low phosphorus soil was used as the background soil, and six KH2PO4 application rates were set: 0, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 200 P mg/kg soil, forming a continuous phosphorus supply gradient from severe phosphorus deficiency to sufficient phosphorus. Foxtail millet was harvested 38 days after sowing (heading stage), and chickpea was harvested 60 days after sowing (flowering stage). Aboveground and underground biomass, and root/shoot ratio of the crops were measured and analyzed. Rhizosphere soil was collected to determine pH, acid phosphatase activity, and carboxylates content.
    Results There were significant differences in the responses of the two crops to soil phosphorus levels. Foxtail millet was extremely sensitive to soil phosphorus levels. with increasing P application, its aboveground biomass increased exponentially, reaching a maximum of 140-fold. In contrast, chickpea’s response to soil phosphorus levels was relatively gentle, with only a slow linear increase in biomass and a maximum increase of 40%. Under low phosphorus stress (P0−P25), foxtail millet secreted carboxylates to acidify the rhizosphere soil, and the pH in P0 and P10 treatments was significantly lower than that in other P gradient treatments. Under low phosphorus conditions (P0−P25), the total carboxylates content in the rhizosphere of foxtail millet was maintained above 4000 nmol/(g, soil), and the total content of secreted carboxylates was about 279 times higher than that of chickpea. However, under high phosphorus conditions (P50−P200), the total carboxylates content in the rhizosphere soil of foxtail millet dropped sharply to below 20 nmol/(g, soil). In contrast, the rhizosphere pH and carboxylates secretion of chickpea showed no significant changes among all phosphorus level treatments, showing relatively “insensitive” rhizosphere chemical regulation characteristics.
    Conclusions Foxtail millet adopts a “sensitive” rhizosphere phosphorus activation strategy, while chickpea exhibits a “conservative” one to cope with changes in soil phosphorus levels. When phosphorus is deficient, foxtail millet activates soil phosphorus by secreting a large amount of carboxylates and protons. Once external phosphorus supply is sufficient, it immediately reduces carboxylates secretion and uptake a large amount of soil phosphorus to achieve explosive growth. In contrast, chickpea is insensitive to changes in soil phosphorus supply, and its growth strategy focuses more on maintaining the stability of internal phosphorus concentration, with stronger tolerance to low phosphorus stress. The application of phosphate fertilizer does not significantly promote its biomass accumulation. Therefore, improving the efficiency of phosphate fertilizer requires full consideration of the phosphorus utilization strategies of crops.

     

/

返回文章
返回