• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S

生物和化学硝化抑制剂在红壤上的硝化抑制效果及驱动因素

Nitrification inhibition effect of biological and chemical nitrification inhibitors in red soils and the influencing factors

  • 摘要:
    目的 施用硝化抑制剂是抑制农田土壤硝化速率、减少肥料氮损失的有效措施,但应用效果受硝化抑制剂类型与施肥管理措施的共同影响,相关抑制机制及其影响因素亟待进一步探明。
    方法 本研究以江西进贤红壤长期定位施肥试验的耕层土壤为供试材料,选取不施肥对照(Control)、单施化肥(NPK)、单施有机肥(OM)、化肥与有机肥配施(NPKM)处理的土壤进行室内培养试验。每个处理土壤再设置3个硝化抑制剂处理:不添加硝化抑制剂(NoNI)、添加生物硝化抑制剂对羟基苯丙酸甲酯(MHPP)、添加化学硝化抑制剂3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐(DMPP),试验开始前测定土壤基础理化性质,在培养开始后0、1、3、6天,取土样分析硝态氮、铵态氮含量,计算净硝化速率和硝化抑制率,分析硝化抑制率与土壤理化性质的相关性。
    结果 与NoNI处理相比,MHPP处理降低了Control、OM和NPKM处理土壤的净硝化速率,降幅分别为62.04%、59.57%和39.73%,硝化抑制率整体约在40%以上,且在OM、NPKM处理的硝化抑制率高于DMPP处理;DMPP处理显著降低了OM和NPKM处理土壤的净硝化速率,降幅分别为60%和40%,硝化抑制率分别约为60%和40%,而在Control和NPK处理中抑制效果不显著。在OM和NPKM处理中,两种抑制剂均能延缓铵态氮转化并降低硝态氮累积,但其抑制效果受施肥制度显著调控。相关分析表明,MHPP抑制效果主要受碳氮比和pH影响,而DMPP则更多受pH和有机碳含量调控。
    结论 长期施肥通过改变红壤pH、有机碳和碳氮比影响硝化抑制剂效果。在有机肥及有机−无机肥配施体系中,MHPP与DMPP均能有效抑制硝化作用,其中MHPP表现出更稳定的抑制效果;而在单施化肥红壤中,DMPP较MHPP更具适用性。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives The application of nitrification inhibitors (NIs) is an effective measure to suppress soil nitrification and reduce nitrogen losses in agricultural ecosystems. However, the efficacy of NIs is influenced by both types of NIs and fertilization management practices. Further investigation is urgently required to elucidate the inhibitory effects of NIs on soil nitrification and underlying mechanisms.
    Methods An incubation experiment was conducted using red soils collected from a long-term fertilization field experiment in Jinxian, Jiangxi Province, China. The soils were derived from four treatments: unfertilized control (Control), mineral fertilizer (NPK), organic fertilizer (OM), and combined mineral and organic fertilizer (NPKM). Three nitrification inhibitor treatments were established for each soil: no nitrification inhibitor (NoNI), the biological nitrification inhibitor methyl 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propionate (MHPP), and the chemical nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP). Soil physicochemical properties were determined before incubation, and soil samples were collected on days 0, 1, 3, and 6 to measure NH4+-N and NO3-N contents. Net nitrification rate, nitrification inhibition rates, and their relationships with soil properties were analyzed.
    Results Compared with NoNI, MHPP treatment reduced the net nitrification rates of the Control, OM, and NPKM treatment soils by 62.04%, 59.57%, and 39.73%, respectively, with nitrification inhibition rates remaining at approximately 40% or higher and being higher than those of DMPP in the OM and NPKM treatments; DMPP treatment reduced the net nitrification rates by approximately 60% and 40% in the OM and NPKM treatments, with inhibition rates of about 60% and 40%, respectively, but showed no significant inhibitory effect in the Control and NPK treatments. In the OM and NPKM treatments, both inhibitors delayed NH4+-N transformation and reduced NO3-N accumulation, although their inhibitory effects were significantly regulated by fertilization regimes. Correlation analysis indicated that the inhibitory effect of MHPP was mainly associated with soil C:N and pH, whereas the effectiveness of DMPP was more strongly related to soil pH and organic carbon content.
    Conclusions Long-term fertilization alters soil pH, organic carbon content, and C:N ratio, thereby affecting the performance of nitrification inhibitors in red soils. Under organic fertilizer and combined organic-mineral fertilizer systems, both MHPP and DMPP effectively suppressed nitrification, with MHPP showing more stable inhibitory performance. In contrast, DMPP is more suitable than MHPP in soils receiving only mineral fertilizer.

     

/

返回文章
返回