• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S
TONG Shao-wei, SHI Lian-hui, LIU Deng-min, JIANG Yuan-mao, GAO Dong-sheng, SHU Huai-rui, HU Yu-tong. Effects of different organic composts on soil characteristics and microbial biomass[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2014, 20(1): 110-117. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0112
Citation:
TONG Shao-wei, SHI Lian-hui, LIU Deng-min, JIANG Yuan-mao, GAO Dong-sheng, SHU Huai-rui, HU Yu-tong. Effects of different organic composts on soil characteristics and microbial biomass[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2014, 20(1): 110-117. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0112

Effects of different organic composts on soil characteristics and microbial biomass

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    SHI Lian-hui E-mail: shilh@sdau.edu.cn

  • Received Date: March 24, 2013
  • Revised Date: December 12, 2013
  • The objective of this experiment was to analyze the short-term effects of different organic composts on orchard soil characteristics and microbial biomass. The effects of beer sludge compost(BSC), dairy manure compost(DMC) and spent mushroom compost(SMC) on soil organic matter, NPK content, bulk density, moisture content, soil respiration, microbial biomass C, N and P (SMBC, SMBN and SMBP) in soil were studied using the pot experiment. The application amount of organic composts was about 50 g/kg. The results showed that compared to CK, the beer sludge, dairy manure and spent mushroom composts obviously decreased bulk density and increased soil porosities(P0.05). The soil water consumption rate of CK was significantly higher than those of BSC, DMC and SMC during one week(P0.05)and was about 1.26 times of BSC, 1.24 times of DMC and 1.14 times of SMC respectively. The soil water absorption and water retention were obviously improved after applying the organic composts. The soil respiration amounts of BSC, DMC and SMC were significantly improved(P0.05) and were increased by 142.17%, 114.30% and 105.39% respectively compared to CK after half a year. The three organic composts could increase the contents of SMBC, SMBN and SMBP significantly after six months(P0.05), the contents of SMBC were about 2.35, 1.84, 1.86 times of that of CK respectively, the contents of SMBN were increased by 135.44%, 99.16%, 90.82% compared to CK, and the contents of SMBP were 2.76, 2.19, 2.04 times of that of CK respectively. The study showed that BSC was the best treatment for soil respiration, microbial biomass and others because of its active granules, the second was DMC, and SMC was the worst.
  • Related Articles

    [1]NIE Cheng, NIU Lei, ZHANG Xu-bo, LI Yue, DU Wei, LIU Ying-hui. Effects of grazing on soil respiration in typical steppe during growing season in Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(3): 402-411. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.18440
    [2]YUAN Jing-jing, TONG Yan-an, LU Shao-hui, YUAN Guo-jun. Combined application of biochar and inorganic nitrogen influnces the microbial properties in soils of jujube orchard[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(4): 1039-1046. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.17462
    [3]WU Rui-juan, WANG Ying-chun, ZHU Ping, HE Mei, HUANG Cheng-cheng, WANG Li-gang, ZHANG Feng-lu. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil respiration in spring maize field in the central part of northeast China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(1): 44-52. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.17109
    [4]GUO Zhen, WANG Xiao-li, XU Hu, DUAN Jian-jun, ZHANG Ya-rong, LI Yu, JIANG Tai-ming. A large number of long-term application of organic fertilizer can effectively increase microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in yellow paddy soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2017, 23(5): 1168-1174. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.17039
    [5]HUO Long, PANG Huan-cheng, LU Chuang, ZHAO Yong-gan, LI Yu-yi. Effect of plastic mulching along with deep burial of straw on dynamics of salinized soil respiration and its affecting factors[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2015, 21(5): 1209-1216. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0514
    [6]SUN Rui, SUN Ben-hua, GAO Ming-xia, YANG Xue-yun, ZHANG Shu-lan. Changes of soil microbial characteristics under long-term different land use patterns on an anthropogenic loess soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2015, 21(3): 655-663. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0312
    [7]GAO Yu, FAN Jun, MI Mei-xia, WANG Li, PENG Xiao-ping. Influencing factors of soil respiration and their response to different land use types in the water-wind erosion crisscross region[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2013, 19(5): 1207-1217. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0521
    [8]TU Chun, WANG Jun, LIU Wen-zhao. Variation in soil respiration and its driving factors in rainfed winter wheat fields with different mulching measures[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2012, 18(5): 1107-1114. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.12089
    [9]HUANG Yi-mei, AN Shao-shan, QU Dong, LI Meng-jun. Comparison between two methods of determination soil microbial biomass nitrogen[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2005, 11(6): 830-835. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2005.0620
    [10]WANG Yan, SUN Jie, WU Jin. Influence of different organic materials on the microbial biomass in contaminated soil of northeastern England[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2000, 6(3): 300-305. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2000.0309
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(45)

    1. 陈倩颖. 菌糠复合物对番茄幼苗期土壤酶活性的影响. 现代园艺. 2025(05): 29-31 .
    2. 孟抒杰,王熠,熊伟,王海燕,陈志彪,黄锦祥,黄想云,罗立津,许祯安,张运富,张仁涛,周文志,王国富. 不同施肥措施对宁化油茶园土壤理化性质及叶绿素含量的影响. 亚热带资源与环境学报. 2024(01): 84-92 .
    3. 宋世霞,刘瑞,徐福才,刘巍,刘丹,刘鹏,艾辛. 有机堆肥对辣椒连作土壤化学性状及酶活性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料. 2024(10): 9-15 .
    4. 申剑,周明涛,胡旭东,尉军耀,张乃畅,赵同晖. 基于砂石骨料脱水污泥及餐厨腐熟质的砾砂种植特性改良研究. 环境工程. 2023(S1): 410-414 .
    5. 赵世淏,程琼仪,孟海波. 不同通风工艺对猪粪好氧堆肥腐熟效果的影响. 环境工程. 2023(S2): 1242-1246 .
    6. 王志慧,刘炳炎,黄彩霞,邱鹏滢,潘宇睦,郑文珺,王俊涛,芦光新. 自然堆肥过程中可培养细菌群落多样性的研究. 青海大学学报. 2022(02): 7-13 .
    7. 吴泽帅,王晓莉,寇存莲,尹翠,王学龙,曹云娥. 餐厨废弃物不同堆肥对沙培基质特性及小白菜生长发育的影响. 农业科学研究. 2022(03): 22-29 .
    8. 朱晓琴,孙涛,张庆琛,裴冬丽,张钦富,王家才. 食用菌菌糠在农业种植中的再利用现状. 北方园艺. 2021(16): 170-175 .
    9. 李源,李青军,张炎,哈丽哈什·依巴提,王爱莲. 氮磷减量与液体有机肥配施对膜下滴灌棉田土壤养分的影响. 干旱地区农业研究. 2020(02): 99-104 .
    10. 萨日娜,陈立新,王娟,刘力勇,邹春娇. 不同有机堆肥对番茄产量、品质和土壤性状的影响. 北方园艺. 2020(22): 42-47 .
    11. 王晓琪,姜伟涛,姚媛媛,尹承苗,陈学森,毛志泉. 苹果连作障碍土壤微生物的研究进展. 园艺学报. 2020(11): 2223-2237 .
    12. 韦增辉,潘运舟,王雨阳,吴治澎,朱治强,吴蔚东. 不同原料商品有机肥对土壤肥力性状及冬瓜产量的影响. 热带作物学报. 2019(02): 232-237 .
    13. 甘洋洋,张野,王瑾,董文斌,曾向阳,何铁光. 基于蚯蚓消化作用的畜禽粪便资源化研究进展. 江苏农业科学. 2019(10): 47-51 .
    14. 朱兰保,盛蒂. 农业废弃物堆肥进程中理化性状的动态变化. 湖北工程学院学报. 2019(03): 21-25 .
    15. 魏岚菁,李培,安瑞琼,谢玉琴,薛应钰. 堆肥浸提液及其堆肥茶对裸仁美洲南瓜白粉病的防治效果. 中国植保导刊. 2019(07): 50-53 .
    16. 刘锦霞,李娜,李晶,丁品,张建军,杜文静,武建荣,李作良. 多效微生物制剂对甘肃干旱区马铃薯连作土壤生态及产量的影响. 土壤通报. 2019(03): 675-682 .
    17. 宋佳明,蔡红光,张秀芝,李翠兰,任军,王立春. 施用不同种类有机肥对黑土磷素含量的影响. 吉林农业大学学报. 2019(06): 707-712 .
    18. 李灵章,刘卓成,余雨泽,常智慧,张桐瑞. 农作物秸秆与畜禽粪便组合的好氧堆肥理化性状研究. 草原与草坪. 2019(06): 49-57 .
    19. 程学超,李衍素,闫妍,于贤昌,贺超兴,林辰壹. 番茄和黄瓜茎秆堆肥还田对生姜生长及根区环境的影响. 新疆农业科学. 2019(10): 1921-1928 .
    20. 连鹏,范周周,郭东矗,曾莹帆,周金星,彭霞薇. 城市污泥与园林废弃物混合堆肥施用对林地土壤微生物量碳、氮及酶活性的影响. 环境科学学报. 2018(07): 2842-2848 .
    21. 李静,陈瑞州,兰子汉,林电. 有机肥替代部分无机肥对菜园土理化特性及果实养分的影响. 热带作物学报. 2018(04): 656-660 .
    22. 王亚奇,杜桂英,崔晓文,周君,肖伟,束怀瑞,高东升,李玲. 一次性施入牛粪对土壤肥力和土壤微生物及酶活性的影响. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版). 2018(02): 181-186 .
    23. 卢锦钊,王克勤,赵洋毅,张继辉. 不同EM菌剂浓度对花生种植的红壤性状及产量影响. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2018(04): 53-58 .
    24. 常大丽,余碧霞,陈运动,张旭辉,焦加国,王东升,李辉信,高继明,徐莉. 蚯蚓堆肥用作苹果育苗基质的应用研究. 土壤. 2018(05): 917-923 .
    25. 李艺坚,谢学方,孔令泽,丰明. 蚯蚓养殖对幼龄胶园土壤养分及橡胶树根系生长的影响. 热带作物学报. 2018(12): 2331-2335 .
    26. 张热萍,卫晋波,李义勇,任随周,柳燕贞,张瑞民,孙国萍. 盆栽作物对堆肥有机质的消耗利用情况研究. 现代农业科技. 2017(10): 8-10 .
    27. 时君,吕得林,乔子涵,刘伸伸,巫厚长. 油菜秸秆与蓝藻混合堆肥及其产物对玉米生长的影响. 安徽农业大学学报. 2017(05): 912-917 .
    28. 宋俊颖,何绪文,戴子瑜,张斯宇. 壳聚糖及其衍生物对土壤中重金属的稳定效果研究. 环境工程. 2017(06): 180-184 .
    29. 黄向东,薛冬. 含竹炭及竹醋液猪粪堆肥用作黑麦草生长基质的效果研究. 科学技术与工程. 2017(01): 9-14 .
    30. 陈贻钊,谢宇,赵依杰,林强,张小红,林航. 海鲜菇菇渣复合红泥土基质对西瓜育苗的影响. 热带作物学报. 2017(06): 1016-1021 .
    31. 魏彬萌. 不同种类有机肥对土壤培肥效果的研究. 陕西农业科学. 2017(10): 73-77+79 .
    32. 徐大兵,邓建强,彭五星,佀国涵,彭成林,袁家富,赵书军,王瑞. 施用牛粪和绿肥对土地整治区玉米产量和土壤理化性质的影响. 应用生态学报. 2017(03): 856-862 .
    33. 张国娟,濮晓珍,张鹏鹏,张旺锋. 干旱区棉花秸秆还田和施肥对土壤氮素有效性及根系生物量的影响. 中国农业科学. 2017(13): 2624-2634 .
    34. 殷姿,张军翔. 堆肥化处理葡萄修剪枝条的可行性综述. 安徽农业科学. 2016(08): 167-169+240 .
    35. 刘昆,徐嘉萍,于天聪,李婷玉,韩成龙,杨巍. 梯度堆肥添加对黑土理化性质的影响. 安徽农业科学. 2016(24): 147-150+169 .
    36. 于晓璐,刘航,刘晓霞,陈俊豪,李国学,李彦明,孙英. 设施条件下添加有机肥对土壤中土霉素消减作用. 农业工程学报. 2016(S2): 304-310 .
    37. 邢鹏飞,高圣超,马鸣超,周晓琳,赵同凯,孙军德,沈德龙. 有机肥替代部分无机肥对华北农田土壤理化特性、酶活性及作物产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料. 2016(03): 98-104 .
    38. 曾令涛,王东升,王祯祎,王斯琪,盛雄杰,常江杰,李辉信,胡锋,焦加国. 蚯蚓堆肥与益生菌配施对土壤肥力及微生物特性的影响. 土壤. 2016(06): 1100-1107 .
    39. 韩伶,李衍素,于贤昌,贺超兴. 日光温室蔬菜残株堆腐后还田对根区土壤环境及蔬菜产量的影响. 应用生态学报. 2016(05): 1553-1559 .
    40. 蒋玉兰,陆凯明,夏仕明,陈璐,刘贺,刘立军. 干湿交替灌溉对水稻产量、品质和土壤生物学性状的影响. 作物杂志. 2016(06): 20-25 .
    41. 黄顾林,左文刚,朱晓雯,陈亚斯,沈袁玲,陶天云,柏彦超,单玉华,封克. 不同有机物料改良新围垦滩涂土壤的效果研究. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版). 2015(02): 51-56 .
    42. 张后虎,彭禹,蔡邦成,赵军. 填埋场覆盖土CH_4氧化及其影响因素. 生态与农村环境学报. 2015(02): 218-222 .
    43. 王琛,孙庆业,韦绪好,熊霞. 堆肥施用和牧草种植对煤矿复垦地土壤肥力的影响. 土壤通报. 2015(05): 1174-1180 .
    44. 蔡苗,孟延,Mohammad Amin Ahmadzai,周建斌. 长期不同施肥对玉米根茬生物量及养分累积量的影响. 应用生态学报. 2015(08): 2387-2396 .
    45. 臧小平,马蔚红,周兆禧,魏长宾,钟爽,左雪冬,刘永霞. 不同有机肥对毛叶枣产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响. 土壤通报. 2014(06): 1445-1449 .

    Other cited types(43)

Catalog

    Article views (3956) PDF downloads (713) Cited by(88)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return