• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S
SUN Xin, ZHANG Fu-cang, YANG Ling, ZHANG Shao-hui, WANG Hai-dong, QIANG Sheng-cai, GUO Jin-jin. Optimal combination of potassium fertilizer and drip irrigation for potato production based on entropy weight method and TOPSIS analysis[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(2): 279-290. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2021356
Citation: SUN Xin, ZHANG Fu-cang, YANG Ling, ZHANG Shao-hui, WANG Hai-dong, QIANG Sheng-cai, GUO Jin-jin. Optimal combination of potassium fertilizer and drip irrigation for potato production based on entropy weight method and TOPSIS analysis[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(2): 279-290. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2021356
shu

Optimal combination of potassium fertilizer and drip irrigation for potato production based on entropy weight method and TOPSIS analysis

  • 1.

    Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas of Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University / Institute of Water-Saving Agriculture in Arid Areas of China, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

  • 2.

    College of Urban and Rural Construction, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi 030800, China

More Information
  • Received Date: July 11, 2021
  • Accepted Date: September 16, 2021
  • Available Online: February 24, 2022
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  To explore the combination of water and potassium for optimized yield, quality, and production efficiency of potato under drip fertigation conditions in northern Shaanxi Province.
      Methods  Field experiments were conducted to study the responses of potato growth, yield and quality to different types of potassium fertilizer and irrigation amount in Yulin, northern Shaanxi. ‘Qingshu No. 9’ was used as the test material. The three irrigation levels were 60%, 80%, and 100% of the crop water requirement (W1, 60% ETc, 198.4 mm; W2, 80% ETc, 246.2 mm; W3, 100% ETc, 294 mm). The four K fertilizer treatments were - no K fertilizer control (K0), KCl, K2SO4 and KNO3. The water use efficiency (WUE) and partial fertilizer productivity (PFP) were calculated.
      Results  The K fertilizer type, irrigation level and their interaction significantly affected potato yield and qualities, WUE and PFP. Under the same K fertilizer, the yield, starch content and net income of W3 treatment were 19.8%, 3.8%, 33.9% higher than W1, and 8.1%, 1.6% and 15.8% higher than W2 treatment, respectively. K fertilizer had different yield increasing effect under different irrigation amount. At W1, the dry matter accumulation and yield of KCl were significantly lower than those of K2SO4 and KNO3. At W2 and W3, the dry matter accumulation, total and marketable yield, and net income of KNO3 were significantly higher than those of KCl and K2SO4, while the latter two had no significant difference. Considering the irrigation × fertilizer interaction, the yield of W3+KNO3 was 9.2%−55.0% higher than other treatment combination. W3+K2SO4 had the highest starch and the lowest reducing sugar content. W3+KCl elicited the largest production to investment ratio, while W1+KNO3 had the highest WUE. Based on entropy weight method and TOPSIS analysis, the comprehensive effect was in order of W3+KNO3>W3+KCl>W2+KNO3>W3+K2SO4>W2+K2SO4>W3K0>W2+KCl>W1+KNO3>W1+K2SO4>W1+ KCl>W2K0>W1K0.
      Conclusions  According to entropy weight method and TOPSIS, the optimum combination for high yield, quality and efficiency of potato in sandy soil is KNO3 with 100% of potato water requirement in northern Shaanxi Province.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (45)
  • [1]
    罗善军, 何英彬, 罗其友, 等. 中国马铃薯生产区域比较优势及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(5): 137–144. Luo S J, He Y B, Luo Q Y, et al. The regional comparative advantages of potato production in China and its influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018, 39(5): 137–144.
    [2]
    关佳晨, 蔡海龙. 我国马铃薯生产格局变化特征及原因分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(3): 92–100. Guan J C, Cai H L. Analysis on the changes and reasons of potato production pattern in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019, 40(3): 92–100.
    [3]
    侯翔皓, 张富仓, 胡文慧, 等. 灌水频率和施肥量对滴灌马铃薯生长、产量和养分吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(1): 85–96. Hou X H, Zhang F C, Hu W H, et al. Effects of irrigation frequency and fertilizer rate on growth, tuber yield and nutrient uptake of drip-irrigated potato[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(1): 85–96. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.18014
    [4]
    焦婉如, 张富仓, 高月, 等. 滴灌施肥生育期比例分配对榆林市马铃薯生长和水分利用的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2018, 36(3): 257–266. Jiao W R, Zhang F C, Gao Y, et al. Effects of fertilizer application rate of drip irrigation fertilization in various growing stages on growth and water use efficiency of potato in Yulin City[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2018, 36(3): 257–266.
    [5]
    方晨成. 钾肥对马铃薯生长发育影响及钾相关基因的表达分析[D]. 四川成都: 四川农业大学硕士学位论文, 2018.

    Fang C C. Effects of potash fertilizer on potato growth and expression analysis of potassium related genes[D]. Chengdu, Sichuan: MS Thesis of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2018.
    [6]
    汤立阳. 钾素对马铃薯生长、产量及品质的影响[D]. 黑龙江哈尔滨: 东北农业大学硕士学位论文, 2018.

    Tang L Y. Effect of potassium application on growth, yield and quality of potato[D]. Harbin, Heilongjiang: MS Thesis of Northeast Agricultural University, 2018.
    [7]
    Abbas M S, Gaber E I, Zied S T A, et al. Evaluation of potassium sources, rates and pattern on the yield and quality traits of fertigated wheat grown in sandy soil[J]. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2020, 23(3): 213–222. DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2020.213.222
    [8]
    Kang W Q, Fan M S, Ma Z, et al. Luxury absorption of potassium by potato plants[J]. American Journal of Potato Research, 2014, 91(5): 573–578. DOI: 10.1007/s12230-014-9386-8
    [9]
    尹梅, 曾庆凤, 张琼, 等. 减量分施钾肥对旱地马铃薯产量和钾肥利用率的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(2): 1–7,36. Yin M, Zeng Q F, Zhang Q, et al. Effect of reduced K amount and split application on yield and nutrient utilization of potato on upland[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(2): 1–7,36.
    [10]
    Grzebisz W, Szczepaniak W, Bocianowski J. Potassium fertilization as a driver of sustainable management of nitrogen in potato (Solanum tuberosum L. )[J]. Field Crops Research, 2020, 254: 107824. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107824
    [11]
    龚成文, 冯守疆, 赵欣楠, 等. 不同钾肥品种对甘肃中部地区马铃薯产量及品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(3): 112–117. Gong C W, Feng S J, Zhao X N, et al. Effects of different potassium fertilizers on yield and quality of potato in central Gansu Province[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(3): 112–117. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7601.2013.03.018
    [12]
    李倩, 李丽杰, 王斌, 张志勇. 不同类型钾肥对花生叶片生理生化特性及产量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(9): 172–176. Li Q, Li L J, Wang B, Zhang Z Y. Effects of different kinds of potassium fertilizers on leaf physiological and biochemical characteristics and yield of peanut[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 51(9): 172–176.
    [13]
    刘汝亮, 李友宏, 王芳, 等. 两种钾源对马铃薯养分累积和产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2009, 18(1): 143–146. Liu R L, Li Y H, Wang F, et al. Effect of different style potassium fertilizer on potato nutrient elements accumulation and yield[J]. Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2009, 18(1): 143–146. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2009.01.030
    [14]
    Hütsch B W, Keipp K, Glaser A K, Schubert S. Potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L. ) are chloride-sensitive: Is this dogma valid?[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2018, 98(8): 3161–3168.
    [15]
    王千, 张淑香, 依艳丽. 硝酸钾和硫酸钾对番茄幼苗生长、根系形态及钾素吸收和生理利用效率的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2012, 26(2): 391–395, 402. Wang Q, Zhang S X, Yi Y L. Effect of potassium nitrate and sulphate on growth, root morphological trails, potassium uptake and utilization efficiency of tomato seedlings[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 26(2): 391–395, 402.
    [16]
    熊增华, 王兴富, 王石军, 薛红魁. 我国硝酸钾产业发展现状与展望[J]. 化工矿物与加工, 2021, 50(5): 49–53. Xiong Z H, Wang X F, Wang S J, Xue H K. Current status and prospect of potassium nitrate development in China[J]. Industrial Minerals & Processing, 2021, 50(5): 49–53.
    [17]
    何志强. 浅议我国钾肥生产技术现状及未来展望[J]. 盐科学与化工, 2018, 47(8): 1–5. He Z Q. The status and development direction of production technology of potassium fertilizer in China[J]. Journal of Salt Science and Chemical Industry, 2018, 47(8): 1–5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3408.2018.08.001
    [18]
    Wei S W, Wang S M, Dong X C, et al. The effect of different potassium fertilizers on fruit flavor quality of ‘Xinliqihao’ pear[J]. Agricultural Biotechnology, 2019, 8(5): 79–85.
    [19]
    薛如君, 高天, 蒋彬虎, 等. 不同硝酸钾滴灌追肥施用量对烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2019, (11): 10–14,21. Xue R J, Gao T, Jiang B H, et al. Effects of different amount of KNO3 drip-fertigation on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2019, (11): 10–14,21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4929.2019.11.003
    [20]
    张富仓, 严富来, 范兴科, 等. 滴灌施肥水平对宁夏春玉米产量和水肥利用效率的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(22): 111–120. Zhang F C, Yan F L, Fan X K, et al. Effects of irrigation and fertilization levels on grain yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency of drip-fertigation spring maize in Ningxia[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(22): 111–120. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.22.014
    [21]
    岳文俊, 陈喜靖, 王维汉, 张富仓. 不同氮处理对温室膜下滴灌甜瓜产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(3): 461–469. Yue W J, Chen X J, Wang W H, Zhang F C. Effects of different nitrogen treatments on yield and quality of greenhouse muskmelon under mulched drip irrigation condition[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(3): 461–469. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.18149
    [22]
    Zou H Y, Fan J L, Zhang F C, et al. Optimization of drip irrigation and fertilization regimes for high grain yield, crop water productivity and economic benefits of spring maize in Northwest China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 230: 105986.
    [23]
    张富仓, 高月, 焦婉如, 等. 水肥供应对榆林沙土马铃薯生长和水肥利用效率的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(3): 270–278. Zhang F C, Gao Y, Jiao W R, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer supply on growth, water and nutrient use efficiencies of potato in sandy soil of Yulin area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(3): 270–278. DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2017.03.034
    [24]
    王小英, 方玉川, 高青青, 等. 不同钾肥品种对马铃薯农艺性状、产量和品质的影响[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2019, 65(11): 27–31. Wang X Y, Fang Y C, Gao Q Q, et al. Effects of different potassium fertilizer varieties on agronomic characters, yield and quality of potato[J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 65(11): 27–31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0488-5368.2019.11.010
    [25]
    Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, Smith M. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56[J]. Roma, 1998, 300(9): D05109.
    [26]
    Kassem M A. Effect of drip irrigation frequency on soil moisture distribution and water use efficiency for spring potato planted under drip irrigation in a sandy soil[J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 2008, 25(4): 1256–1278.
    [27]
    乔富廉. 植物生理学实验分析测定技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2002.

    Qiao F L. Plant physiology experimental analysis and determination technology[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2002.
    [28]
    Watson D J. Comparative physiological studies in the growth of field crops. I: variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years[J]. Annals of Botany, 1947, 11(41): 41–76.
    [29]
    Cassman K G, Gines G C, Dizon M A, et al. Nitrogen-use efficiency in tropical lowland rice systems: Contributions from indigenous and applied nitrogen[J]. Field Crops Research, 1996, 47(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/0378-4290(95)00101-8
    [30]
    Allen R G, Pereira L S, Howell T A, Jensen M E. Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 98(6): 899–920. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.015
    [31]
    Oweis T Y, Farahani H J, Hachum A Y. Evapotranspiration and water use of full and deficit irrigated cotton in the Mediterranean environment in northern Syria[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 98(8): 1239–1248. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.02.009
    [32]
    张永成, 田丰. 马铃薯实验研究方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社. 2007.

    Zhang Y C, Tian F. Potato experiment research method[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press , 2007.
    [33]
    Cheng M H, Wang H D, Fan J L, et al. Effects of soil water deficit at different growth stages on maize growth, yield, and water use efficiency under Alternate Partial root-zone irrigation[J]. Water, 2021, 13(2): 148–167. DOI: 10.3390/w13020148
    [34]
    Wang H D, Wang X K, Bi L F, et al. Multi-objective optimization of water and fertilizer management for potato production in sandy areas of northern China based on TOPSIS[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019, 240: 55–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.06.005
    [35]
    胡萌萌, 张继宗, 张立峰, 等. 水分胁迫及复水对马铃薯生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(2): 95–101,121. Hu M M, Zhang J Z, Zhang L F, et al. Effects of water stress and rewatering on potato growth and yield[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39(2): 95–101,121. DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2021.02.13
    [36]
    邓兰生, 林翠兰, 龚林, 等. 滴施不同钾肥对马铃薯生长及产量的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2010, 31(2): 12–14,27. Deng L S, Lin C L, Gong L, et al. Effect of different potassium fertilizers on growth and production of potato under fertigation[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2010, 31(2): 12–14,27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2010.02.004
    [37]
    陈焕丽, 郭竞, 张晓静, 等. 不同形态钾肥对马铃薯产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(4): 79–82. Chen H L, Guo J, Zhang X J, et al. Effects of different forms of potassium fertilizer on potato yield and quality[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2021, 34(4): 79–82. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2871.2021.04.014
    [38]
    张舒涵, 张俊莲, 王文, 李朝周. 氯化钾对干旱胁迫下马铃薯根系生理及形态的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018, (5): 77–84. Zhang S H, Zhang J L, Wang W, Li C Z. Influence of potassium chloride on the root physiology and morphology of potato under drought stress[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2018, (5): 77–84. DOI: 10.11838/sfsc.20180512
    [39]
    周鹏, 彭福田, 魏绍冲, 彭勇. 氮素形态对平邑甜茶细胞分裂素水平和叶片生长的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2007, (2): 269–274. Zhou P, Peng F T, Wei S C, Peng Y. Effects of rhizosphere nitrate and ammonium on the level of cytokinins and leaf growth of Malus hupenensis Rehd[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2007, (2): 269–274. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2007.02.001
    [40]
    Souza E F C, Soratto R P, Sandana P, et al. Split application of stabilized ammonium nitrate improved potato yield and nitrogen-use efficiency with reduced application rate in tropical sandy soils[J]. Field Crops Research, 2020, 254: 107847. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107847
    [41]
    Yakimenko V N, Naumove N B. Potato tuber yield and quality under different potassium application rates and forms in west siberia[J]. Agriculture, 2018, 64(3): 128–136.
    [42]
    王英, 张富仓, 王海东, 等. 滴灌频率和灌水量对榆林沙土马铃薯产量、品质和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4159–4168. Wang Y, Zhang F C, Wang H D, et al. Effects of the frequency and amount of drip irrigation on yield, tuber quality and water use efficiency of potato in sandy soil of Yulin, northern Shaanxi, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(12): 4159–4168.
    [43]
    谷贺贺, 李静, 张洋洋, 等. 钾肥与我国主要作物品质关系的整合分析[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(10): 1749–1757. Gu H H, Li J, Zhang Y Y, et al. Meta-analysis of the relationship between potassium fertilizer and the quality of main crops in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(10): 1749–1757. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.20146
    [44]
    王煜, 俞双恩, 丁继辉, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型评价不同施氮水平下水稻灌排模式[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2020, 38(7): 720–725. Wang Y, Yu S E, Ding J H, et al. Entropy weight TOPSIS model-based evaluation of rice irrigation and drainage modes at different nitrogen application levels[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2020, 38(7): 720–725.
    [45]
    Rasool G, Guo X P, Wang Z C, et al. Coupling fertigation and buried straw layer improves fertilizer use efficiency, fruit yield, and quality of greenhouse tomato[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 239: 106239. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106239
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]DONG Yu-heng, WANG Zhi-gang, WANG Fu-gui, WANG Yong-qiang, WANG Zhen, BAI Lan-fang, CHENG Zhi-peng, CAO Yan-ting, SUN Lei, YU Jing-hui, XU Jun-yan. Split topdressing of NPK fertilizer improve the economic benefits and fertilizer use efficiency of spring maize production[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2024448
    [2]WU Shuai-bing, MIAO Qi, WANG Hong-ye, WANG Yun-hong, LI Jun-chao, SONG Hua-feng, LIU Yu-ming, WANG Wei-dong, CUI Zhen-ling. Optimizing nitrogen fertilizer management to improve yield, N use efficiency and profit of spring maize in coastal saline soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2023, 29(9): 1573-1586. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2023054
    [3]ZHANG Fan, CHEN Meng-ru, XING Ying-ying, DANG Fei-fei, LI Yuan, WANG Xiu-kang. Optimization of fertilizer and drip irrigation levels for efficient potato production based on entropy weight method and TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2023, 29(4): 732-744. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2022426
    [4]LIU Peng-zhao, LI Meng-hao, SONG Yang-chao, YANG Dong, GAO Xiao-dong, REN Xiao-long, CHEN Xiao-li. Effects of fertigation on yield, water and nitrogen utilization and economic productivity benefit of wolfberry (Lycium barbarum L.)[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(10): 1820-1828. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2021166
    [5]REN Ning, WANG Yang, WANG Gai-ge, ZHAO Ya-nan, HUANG Yu-fang, YUE Song-hua, YE You-liang. Yield, nitrogen use and economic benefit of summer maize under different ratios of controlled-release and ordinary urea combination in normal and dry rainfall years[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(4): 681-691. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.19258
    [6]ZHOU Wen-wen, JIA Hao-ran, ZHANG Yue, LI Wei, LI Bao-tong, TANG Li-mei. Effects of different new types of fertilizer on yield, nitrogen use eiificiency and economic benefit of double cropping rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(4): 657-668. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.19269
    [7]LIN Hong-xin, PAN Xiao-hua, YUAN Zhan-qi, XIAO Yun-ping, LIU Ren-gen, WANG Rui-qing, LÜ Feng-juan. Effects of nitrogen application and cassava–peanut intercropping patterns on crop yields and economic benefit[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(4): 947-958. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.17329
    [8]WANG Xiu-bin, XU Xing-peng, SUN Jing-wen, LIANG Guo-qing, LIU Guang-rong, ZHOU Wei. Effects of nitrogen application on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and economic benefit of double-cropping rice by mechanical transplanting[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(5): 1167-1176. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.15317
    [9]CAO Bing, NI Xiao-hui, XIAO Qiang, XU Kai, YANG Jun-gang, YI Wen-ping, LI Li-xia. Impact of coated urea on yield, quality and economic returns of greenhouse tomato[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2014, 20(2): 389-395. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0215
    [10]LIN Hong-xin, YUAN Zhan-qi, LIU Ren-gen, XIAO Yun-ping, HUANG Xue-hua, WANG Rui-qing. Effects of different N, P and K treatments on yield, nutrient accumulation and utilization and economic benefit of cassava[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2012, 18(6): 1459-1468. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.12107

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 胡晨阳，杨金翰，索文康，谢世兴，董萌萌，郭唯，袁搏，郝喜英，田小明. 水肥减量添加调理剂对马铃薯产量、品质及经济效益的影响. 江苏农业科学. 2025(02): 107-113 .
    2. 刘彦岑，郭俊先，郭阳，史勇，黄华，李龙杰，张振振. 基于熵权-TOPSIS的哈密瓜田间水肥耦合评价. 江苏农业科学. 2024(01): 141-147 .
    3. 付锦涛，张香竹，郑煜，解云霞，邢英英，王秀康. 化肥减量配施有机肥和灌水量对马铃薯生长、产量及水肥利用效率的影响. 江苏农业科学. 2024(17): 73-79 .
    4. 刘俊涛，贾黎明，闫小莉，张卫华，蔡婉婷，仲静，王立宪，曹秋丽，赵鹏丽，陈义勇，余佳欣，陈娜，翁学煌. 配方施肥对无患子幼树光合特性和生长的影响. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 23-33 .
    5. 晏世杰，段剑，沈发兴，谢东杰，郑海金. 套种药材对红壤坡地幼龄油茶园产流产沙及氮磷流失的影响. 水土保持学报. 2024(06): 70-78 .
    6. 杨金翰，田小明，胡晨阳，索文康，董萌萌，郭唯，郝喜英. 不同灌溉施肥组合下添加调理剂对土壤水分养分的影响. 华北农学报. 2024(S1): 175-186 .
    7. 郭常英，王伟，彭丹，蒲小剑，傅云洁，王龙然，徐成体. 播种方式和行距对高寒地区燕麦/饲用豌豆草地土壤理化特性的影响. 草业科学. 2023(03): 654-664 .
    8. 张帆，陈梦茹，邢英英，党菲菲，李源，王秀康. 基于熵权法和TOPSIS对马铃薯施肥和滴灌量组合的优化. 植物营养与肥料学报. 2023(04): 732-744 . 本站查看
    9. 康燕霞，姜渊博，齐广平，银敏华，马彦麟，汪精海，贾琼，唐仲霞，汪爱霞. 红豆草与无芒雀麦混播草地生产力提升的水分调控模式研究. 草业学报. 2023(08): 115-128 .
    10. 李彩弟，张春平，俞旸，刘玉祯，杨增增，冯斌，张小芳，张雪，杨晓霞，董全民. 高寒地区不同饲草单播及混播综合效益评价. 草业科学. 2023(07): 1875-1887 .
    11. 王海根，王庆同，杨鹏，宇星辰，毛方松，张家浩. 基于熵权优劣解距离模型（TOPSIS）的海洋资源环境承载力评价——以潍坊市为例. 海岸工程. 2023(03): 288-300 .
    12. 宋慧，郭岩，邢璐，李龙，臧贺藏，李国强，王素英，郑国清. 基于灰色关联度、DTOPSIS与灰色局势决策法的谷子品种综合评价. 中国农业大学学报. 2023(11): 42-56 .
    13. 周罕觅，孙旗立，张硕，王升升，秦龙，李心平. 基于多目标综合评价的滴灌苹果水肥协同调控研究. 农业机械学报. 2023(11): 335-346 .
    14. 王昭仪，脱云飞，刘香凝，石小兰，丁明净，黎建强，向萍，何霞红，杨启良. 土壤养分和酶活性及三七产量、皂苷含量对水肥耦合的响应. 植物营养与肥料学报. 2023(12): 2332-2344 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(15)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1567) PDF downloads (71) Cited by(29)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Copyright© 2006-2010 Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science.

    Tel：010-82108653 Email：zwyf@caas.cn

    京ICP备14003094号-3

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. Technical support: info@rhhz.net   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return