• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S
LI Hong-yan, HU Tie-cheng, CAO Qun-hu, YU Chang-wei, CAO Wei-dong, HUANG Dong-lin, ZHAI Bing-nian, GAO Ya-jun. Effect of improving soil fertility by planting different green manures in different patterns in dryland[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(5): 1310-1318. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.15423
Citation: LI Hong-yan, HU Tie-cheng, CAO Qun-hu, YU Chang-wei, CAO Wei-dong, HUANG Dong-lin, ZHAI Bing-nian, GAO Ya-jun. Effect of improving soil fertility by planting different green manures in different patterns in dryland[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(5): 1310-1318. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.15423
shu

Effect of improving soil fertility by planting different green manures in different patterns in dryland

  • 1.

    College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

  • 2.

    Shaanxi Changwu District Agro-technology Extension Center, Changwu, Shaanxi 713600, China

  • 3.

    Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

  • 4.

    Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

More Information
  • Received Date: October 13, 2015
  • Accepted Date: March 05, 2016
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Objectives The soil of dryland areas of the Loess Plateau is often barren, the heat and precipitation resources can not be fully utilized during summer fallow period. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted to investigate effects of green manure crop varieties and planting patterns on their biomass, nutrient contents, soil nutrient contents, soil enzyme activities, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and dissolve organic carbon (DOC) to determine the best green manure crop variety and planting pattern, which can be regarded as the theoretic base and technical support for the development of sustainable agriculture in the Loess Plateau.
    Methods An experiment with randomized complete block design was conducted. The bare fallow in summer was used as control, two factors were green manure varieties (Mung bean, Huai bean, Hairy vetch and Rape)and planting patterns (after wheat harvest and intercropped with wheat), counting to 9 treatments. The green manure was harvested in full blooming stage and the yield of fresh grass was weighted, the N, P and K contents were analyzed. The root samples were collected inside volume 20 cm × 20 cm × 20 cm at the bottom of 50 plants in each plot and weighted, soil samples (0-20 cm deep) were collected 20 days after the green manure was returned into field, and the contents of nutrients, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and dissolve organic carbon (DOC), as well as the activities of main soil enzymes, were determined.
    ResultsThe results indicated that the after wheat harvest had greater biomass than intercropping, the Huai bean and rape treatments had greater biomass than other green manures in the after wheat harvest, and the biomass of rape treatments was significantly increased in contrast with other green manures in the intercropped with wheat. The changes of green manure nutrient contents were similar to those biomass in different planting patterns. Huai bean provided the highest amounts of nitrogen and phosphorous, while rape offered the highest amounts of phosphorous and potassium through incorporation in the after wheat harvest, and the amounts of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium through incorporation in the intercropped with wheat were rape > hairy vetch > Mung bean > Huai bean. The rape treatment significantly increased soil organic matter (SOM), available phosphorous and available potassium compared with the fallow. After 2 years of the after wheat harvest, the Huai bean treatment enhanced soil organic matter(SOM), total nitrogen, mineral nitrogen, available phosphorous and available potassium contents in the depth of 0-20 cm by 12.4%, 22.2%, 95.9%, 28.6% and 11.2%, respectively, compared with the fallow. Incorporation of green manure during summer fallow period increased soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) content and dissolve organic carbon (DOC) content compared with the fallow, and the rape treatments significantly increased soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and dissolve organic carbon (DOC) in the intercropped with wheat. There were no significant differences of soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) between the green manure treatments in the after wheat harvest, however, the contents were greater than those of the fallow (P < 0.05). Green manure in the after wheat harvest enhanced soil enzyme activities compared with the fallow, and other intercropped with wheat green manures increased soil enzyme activities except the Mung bean treatment which decreased the enzyme activities of urease and catalase. The significant correlations between soil properties and green manure biomass indicated that the soil fertility was determined by the amount of green manure biomass to soil.
    Conclusions The Huai bean and rape treatments could significantly increase soil nutrient contents and soil enzyme activities and they were better than Mung bean and hairy vetch. As for the planting patterns, the after wheat harvest was better than the intercropped with wheat. Huai bean and rape as green manure applied after wheat harvest can effectively improve soil quality in dryland of the Loess Plateau.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (27)
  • [1]
    Blaser B C, Singer J W, Gibson L R. Winter cereal, seeding rate,and intercrop seeding rate effect on red clover yield and quality[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2007, 99(3):723-729. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0247
    [2]
    Agegnehu G, Ghizaw A, Sinebo W. Yield potential and land-use efficiency of wheat and faba bean mixed intercropping[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2008, 28(2):257-263. DOI: 10.1051/agro:2008012
    [3]
    Pimentel D, Cerasale D, Stanley R C, et al. Annual vs. perennial grain production[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2012, 161:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.05.025
    [4]
    姚致远, 王峥, 李婧, 等. 轮作及绿肥不同利用方式对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(8):2329-2336. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSB201508013.htm

    Yao Z Y, Wang Z, Li J, et al. Effects of rotations and different green manure utilizations on crop yield and soil fertility[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(8):2329-2336. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSB201508013.htm
    [5]
    李富翠, 赵护兵, 王朝辉, 等. 渭北旱地夏闲期秸秆还田和种植绿肥对土壤水分、养分和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报. 2011, 30(9):1861-1871. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NHBH201109032.htm

    Li F C, Zhao H B, Wang Z H, et al. Effects of straw mulching and planting green manure on soil water, nutrient and winter wheat yield on Weibei plateau, China[J]. Journal of Agro-environment Science, 2011, 30(9):1861-1871. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NHBH201109032.htm
    [6]
    张达斌. 种植豆科绿肥和施肥对渭北旱塬冬小麦产量及土壤性质的影响[D]. 陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 2012.

    Zhang D B. Effects of leguminous green manure and N fertilizer om winter wheat yield and soil properties in Weibei area[D]. Yangling, Shaanxi:Northwest A&F university, 2012.
    [7]
    陈玉香, 周道玮. 玉米-苜蓿间作的生态效应[J]. 生态环境, 2003, 12(4):467-468. http://epub.cnki.net/kns/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=0&CurRec=1&recid=&FileName=TRYJ200304024&DbName=CJFD2003&DbCode=CJFQ&pr=

    Chen Y X, Zhou D W. The ecological effect of maize intercropping with alfalfa in the ecotone between agriculture and animal husbandry in northeast China[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2003, 12(4):467-468. http://epub.cnki.net/kns/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=0&CurRec=1&recid=&FileName=TRYJ200304024&DbName=CJFD2003&DbCode=CJFQ&pr=
    [8]
    Tejendra C, Andrew R. Barley-pea intercropping:effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogen transformations[J]. Field Crops Research, 2014, 166:18-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.014
    [9]
    张恩和, 黄高宝, 黄鹏. 不同供磷水平下粮豆间套种植对根系分布和根际效应的影响[J]. 草业学报, 1999, 8(3):35-38. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CYXB199903005.htm

    Zhang E H, Huang G B, Huang P. The effects of phosphorus application levels on the root growth and rhizosphere with intercropping system of spring wheat and soybean[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 1999, 8(3):35-38. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CYXB199903005.htm
    [10]
    Betencourt E, Duputel M, Colomb B, et al. Intercropping promotes the ability of durum wheat and chickpea to increase rhizosphere phosphorus availability in a low P soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 46:181-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.11.015
    [11]
    杨瑞吉, 马海灵, 杨祁峰, 等. 种植密度与施氮量对麦茬复种饲料油菜土壤微生物活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(1):113-117. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSB200701018.htm

    Yang R J, Ma H L,Yang Q F, et al. Effects of planting density and nitrogen application rate on soil microbial activity under wheat/forage rape multiple cropping[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(1):113-117. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYSB200701018.htm
    [12]
    关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1987.

    Guan S Y. Soil enzyme and its study method[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Press, 1987.
    [13]
    和文祥, 谭向平, 王旭东, 等. 土壤总体酶活性指标的初步研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2010, 47(6):1232-1236. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRXB201006024.htm

    He W X, Tan X P, Wang X D, et al. Study on total enzyme activity index in soils[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(6):1232-1236. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRXB201006024.htm
    [14]
    李银平, 徐文修, 陈冰, 等. 绿肥种植模式对连作棉田土壤肥力及棉花产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(9):149-153. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBNX201009030.htm

    Li Y P, Xu W X, Chen B, et al. Effect of different planting patterns of green manures on soil fertility and cotton yield[J]. Acta Agriculture Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2010, 19(9):149-153. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBNX201009030.htm
    [15]
    李婧, 张达斌, 王峥, 等. 施肥和绿肥翻压方式对旱地冬小麦生长及土壤水分利用的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(3):136-142. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHDQ201203023.htm

    Li J, Zhang D B, Wang Z, et al. Effect of fertilizer and green manure incorporation methods on the growth and water use efficiency of winter wheat[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2012, 30(3):136-142. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHDQ201203023.htm
    [16]
    罗贞宝. 绿肥对烟田土壤的改良作用及对烟叶品质的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学硕士学位论文, 2006

    Luo Z B. Effects of green manure application on soil improvement of tobacco field and quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves[D]. Zhengzhou:MS Thesis of Henan Agricultural. University, 2006.
    [17]
    Shah Z A, Hmad S R, Latif A, et al. Rice wheat yields in relation to biomass of green manure legumes[J]. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 2011, 27(1):73-84.
    [18]
    李银平, 徐文修, 候松山, 等. 春小麦复播绿肥对连作棉田土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(6):151-154. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNTB200906037.htm

    Li Y P, Xu W X, Hou S S, et al. The influence of spring wheat and green manure to the soil fertility of the continuous cropping cotton fields[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2009, 25(6):151-154. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNTB200906037.htm
    [19]
    王晓军. 黑龙江绿肥种植对土壤肥力及小麦产量的影响[D]. 黑龙江: 中国农业科学院硕士学位论文, 2011.

    Wang X J. The Effects of green manure cropping on soil fertility and wheat yield in Heilongjiang Province[D]. Heilongjiang:MS Thesis of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2011.
    [20]
    王丹英, 彭建, 徐春梅, 等. 油菜作绿肥还田的培肥效应及对水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 26(1):85-91. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGSK201201013.htm

    Wang D Y, Peng J, Xu C M, et al. Effects of rape straw manuring on soil fertility and rice growth[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 26(1):85-91. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGSK201201013.htm
    [21]
    王晓军, 于凤芝, 宿庆瑞, 等. 不同绿肥品种综合利用价值的比较[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2010, (6):55-57. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLJN201006020.htm

    Wang X J, Yu F Z, Su Q R, et al. Comparison of comprehensive utilization value with different green manure varieties[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010, (6):55-57. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLJN201006020.htm
    [22]
    倪进治, 徐建民, 谢正苗. 土壤水溶性有机碳的研究进展[J]. 生态环境, 2003, 12(1):71-75. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRYJ200301018.htm

    Ni J Z, Xu J M, Xie Z M. Advances in soil water-soluble organic carbon research[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2003, 12(1):71-75. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRYJ200301018.htm
    [23]
    王伯诚, 赖小芳, 陈银龙, 等. 紫云英带籽翻耕的氮肥促腐效应[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(34):16610-16612. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AHNY201234040.htm

    Wang B C, Lai X F, Chen Y L, et al. Study on promoting decay effect of fertilizer-nitrogen of astragalus sinicus ploughed at maturity stage[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(34):16610-16612. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AHNY201234040.htm
    [24]
    Tabatabai M A. Effects of trace elements on urease activity in soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1997, 9(1):9-13. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2083055482&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [25]
    Riffaldi R, Saviozzi A, Levi-Minzi R, et al. Biochemical properties of a Mediterranean soil as affected by long-term crop management systems[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2002, 67(1):109-114. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2043925030&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [26]
    武雪萍, 刘增俊, 赵跃华, 等. 施用芝麻饼肥对植烟根际土壤酶活性和微生物碳、氮的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005,11(4):541-546. http://www.plantnutrifert.org/CN/abstract/abstract1741.shtml

    Wu X P, Liu Z J, Zhao Y H, et al. Effects of sesame cake fertilizer on soil enzyme activities and microbial C and N at rhizosphere of tobacco[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2005, 11(4):541-546. http://www.plantnutrifert.org/CN/abstract/abstract1741.shtml
    [27]
    刘国顺, 李正, 敬海霞, 等. 连年翻压绿肥对植烟土壤微生物量及酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(6):1472-1478. http://www.plantnutrifert.org/CN/abstract/abstract2569.shtml

    Liu G S, Li Z, Jing H X, et al. Effects of consecutive turnover of green manures on soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(6):1472-1478. http://www.plantnutrifert.org/CN/abstract/abstract2569.shtml
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Hai-fan, ZHAO Pu-sheng, GUO Tao. Response of phosphorus uptake by rape and bioavailability of soil phosphorus to carbon and phosphorus addition[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2024, 30(11): 2072-2081. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2024237
    [2]WANG Yun-hong, ZHANG Ji-shi, WANG Hong-ye, LIU Xiu-ping, CUI Zhen-ling, MIAO Qi. Improving soil properties and maize yield by integrating soil and crop management measures in coastal saline area[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(11): 2045-2053. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2021172
    [3]GUAN Tian-xia, MA Guo-tai, MA Zhi-lu, LIU Zhi-fang, ZHANG Fen-qin, ZHANG You-fu, DENG Jiang-xia, MA Xiao-hua, HAN Yu-si. Effects of continuous application of chicken manure on field-grown cucumber yield, quality, and soil properties[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(8): 1351-1360. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2021024
    [4]ZHAO Ze-zhou, WANG Xiao-ling, LI Hong-bo, REN Shu-peng, CHEN Jing, WANG Lin-ling. Slow-release property and soil remediation mechanism of biochar-based fertilizers[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(5): 886-897. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.20472
    [5]CHEN Kun, QIN Yu-sheng, YU Hua, KANG Si-wen, FAN Hong-zhu, ZENG Xiang-zhong, TU Shi-hua. Impacts of different fertilizers/amendments on rice yield and nutrient uptake and soil properties in the waterlogged paddy field[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2015, 21(3): 773-781. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0325
    [6]YIN Cheng-miao, CHEN Xue-sen, SHEN Xiang, ZHANG Zhao-bo, SUN Hai-bing, MAO Zhi-quan*. Effect of different irrigating concentrations of fermented organic fluid on the young apple tree biomass and the soil properties in replant soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2013, 19(6): 1450-1458. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0620
    [7]LI Xiao-kun, LU Jian-wei, CHEN Fang, LI Wen-xi, ZHAO Hui-xing. Effects of different fertilization treatments on forage yield and soil properties in sudangrass–ryegrass rotation[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2008, 14(3): 581-586. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2008.0328
    [8]LIN Ying-hua, ZHU Ping, ZHANG Fu-dao, PENG Chang, GAO Hong-jun, LIU Shu-huan. Variation of composition and diversification of cropland soil fauna under different fertilizer application condition in the Black soil,Jilin province[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2006, 12(3): 412-419. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2006.0321
    [9]SUN Rui-lian, ZHAO Bing-qiang, ZHU Lu-sheng. 长期施肥对土壤微生物学特性的影响[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2002, 8(S1): 151-154.
    [10]SUN Ben-hua, YANG Xue-yun, GU Qiao-zhen, MA Lu-jun, ZHAO Bing-qiang, ZHANG Fu-dao. 黄土施肥效应与肥力演变的长期定位监测研究 Ⅱ．长期施肥对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2002, 8(S1): 71-74.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(93)

    1. 张钦，姚单君，廖恒，况胜剑，梁燕菲，曹卫东，朱青，秦松. 不同绿肥作物周年搭配种植下土壤微生物养分限制与土壤质量指数. 植物营养与肥料学报. 2025(01): 77-88 . 本站查看
    2. 张雪梅，付利波，尹梅，王志远，陈华，陈检锋，徐金玉，杨艳鲜，王伟，苏友波. 翻压绿肥及配施氮肥对土壤有机碳含量和玉米产量的影响. 江苏农业科学. 2025(03): 265-271 .
    3. 张冬玲，于爱忠，吕汉强，杨学慧，王玉珑，王鹏飞，尚永盼，尹波，刘亚龙，王凤. 绿肥还田结合减量施氮对绿洲灌区麦田N_2O排放和小麦产量的影响. 作物学报. 2025(04): 1005-1021 .
    4. 张雁霞，谌国鹏，孙晓敏，邢丽红，瞿利英，薛艳，王佳伟. 高产高油多抗油菜新品种‘汉油23’的选育及栽培技术. 农学学报. 2025(03): 7-12 .
    5. 秦文利，智健飞，谢楠，张立锋，刘忠宽，刘振宇，冯伟，潘璇，代云霞. 绿肥部分替代化肥对玉米干物质积累与产量形成的影响. 中国农业科学. 2024(13): 2549-2567 .
    6. 王威，卢树昌. 油菜翻压与生物炭施用对新建温室土壤性状影响研究. 土壤通报. 2024(03): 677-685 .
    7. 管彤彤，张燕，陶海宁，董秀，沈禹颖. 绿肥还田对土壤有机碳组分及碳转化酶活性的影响. 中国农业科学. 2024(14): 2791-2802 .
    8. 程李洋，何浩，鲁伟丹，常相杰，杨晓娟，李俊华. 化肥减量结合大豆绿肥还田对小麦产量及土壤有机碳组分的影响. 土壤通报. 2024(05): 1328-1336 .
    9. 唐倩，张松茂，王国璀，杨昭，柴强，胡发龙. 绿肥还田量与小麦复种绿肥水分利用效率的相关性. 甘肃农业大学学报. 2024(05): 38-45 .
    10. 单俏，王小燕，崔璨，陈展鹏，陈方鑫. 绿肥作物对柑橘园土壤重金属富集转运的影响. 土壤通报. 2024(06): 1768-1776 .
    11. 王贞元，冶瑞，赵劲飞，张全忠，苏广东，廖结安. 种植绿肥对土壤性状改良的研究进展. 北方果树. 2023(01): 1-5 .
    12. 丁林，王文娟，梁仲锷，吴婕. 不同水肥处理对膜下滴灌玉米农田养分及产量品质的影响. 水利规划与设计. 2023(03): 37-42+126 .
    13. 田家乐. 不同灌溉方式对东北地区小麦生长及其产量的影响试验. 水利技术监督. 2023(03): 137-140 .
    14. 夏融，童文杰，马二登，刘棋，余磊，黄飞燕，刘佳妮，邓小鹏. 绿肥掩青对连作烟田土壤性质及烤烟产质量的影响. 安徽农业科学. 2023(07): 165-170 .
    15. 谢楠，李梦，冯伟，刘振宇，张立锋，智健飞，杜姿璇，刘忠宽. 河北坝上地区野豌豆作为绿肥的生产潜力研究. 中国草地学报. 2023(04): 100-106 .
    16. 杨学珍，张世新，李利利. 豆科绿肥还田与氮肥配施对旱地冬小麦产量和水分利用特征的影响. 江苏农业科学. 2023(08): 232-239 .
    17. 王威，卢树昌，李夏雯，张迎珂，夏渝静. 生物炭施用与油菜种植对新建设施土壤性状的影响. 北方园艺. 2023(08): 70-77 .
    18. 祁琛，吴林甲，闫秋艳，闫双堆，董飞，李峰，程永钢，黄肖. 夏闲期复播绿肥对旱地麦田土壤团聚体碳氮含量的影响. 水土保持学报. 2023(04): 304-312 .
    19. 王鹏飞，于爱忠，王玉珑，苏向向，柴健，李悦，吕汉强，尚永盼，杨学慧. 麦后复种绿肥翻压还田结合减氮对土壤水热特性及玉米产量的影响. 作物学报. 2023(10): 2793-2805 .
    20. 斯林林，徐静，曹凯，张贤，王建红. 绿肥种植对红壤旱地生土细菌群落结构的影响. 浙江农业学报. 2023(08): 1864-1875 .
    21. 张文霞，李盼，殷文，陈桂平，樊志龙，胡发龙，范虹，何蔚. 麦后复种绿肥及配施不同水平氮肥对小麦产量、品质及氮素利用的影响. 中国农业科学. 2023(17): 3317-3330 .
    22. 刘陈，王伟妮，廖世鹏，任涛，鲁剑巍. 我国油菜绿肥研究进展. 中国土壤与肥料. 2023(11): 248-254 .
    23. 袁苗苗，向春阳，赵秋，史昕倩，董家僖，田秀平. 翻压9种春油菜对潮土有机质及其氧化稳定性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究. 2022(01): 213-220 .
    24. 陈子英，常单娜，韩梅，李正鹏，严清彪，张久东，周国朋，孙小凤，曹卫东. 47份箭筈豌豆品种（系）在青海作秋绿肥的能力评价. 草业学报. 2022(02): 39-51 .
    25. 张达斌，黄文凤，惠蕾，张东亮，李志琴，陈姣，付蓉，王朝辉，曹卫东，高亚军. PEG胁迫下旱地油菜绿肥苗期抗旱性筛选和评价. 植物营养与肥料学报. 2022(01): 168-180 . 本站查看
    26. 陈子英，常单娜，韩梅，李正鹏，严清彪，周国朋，孙小凤，曹卫东. 50份毛叶苕子品种(系)在青海作秋绿肥的能力评价. 植物营养与肥料学报. 2022(04): 701-714 . 本站查看
    27. 浩立军，罗康宁，张文伟，李利利. 陇东旱塬区夏绿肥筛选及还田对冬小麦生长的影响. 农业科技通讯. 2022(04): 87-90 .
    28. 吕汉强，胡发龙，于爱忠，苏向向，王玉珑，殷文，柴强. 荒漠绿洲区不同绿肥还田方式下玉米农田土壤团聚体微结构特征. 中国生态农业学报(中英文). 2022(06): 952-964 .
    29. 骆美，郭龙，费坤，张天恩，李陈，马友华. 耕地质量提升技术及其应用. 中国农学通报. 2022(21): 76-81 .
    30. 苏向向，于爱忠，吕汉强，王玉珑. 绿洲灌区小麦复种绿肥并翻压还田对翌年玉米产量形成及氮素吸收利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报. 2022(07): 1208-1218 . 本站查看
    31. 赵文军，薛开政，杨继周，胡保文，付利波，尹梅，陈检锋，王伟，王志远，王应学，李延润，陈华. 烤烟-绿肥轮作对烤烟产量和品质的影响. 中国农学通报. 2022(25): 8-15 .
    32. 刘振华，张霞，夏清，李文广，代新俊，郭安娜，杨珍平，高志强. 磷肥与播量对麦后复种饲料油菜干物质量及土壤肥力的影响. 山西农业科学. 2022(10): 1446-1454 .
    33. 吕本春，王应学，杨伟，王伟，陈检锋，尹梅，陈华，王志远，付利波，杨志新. 豆科绿肥作物对云南碱性土壤镉砷有效性的影响及其对镉砷富集能力. 农业环境科学学报. 2022(10): 2212-2222 .
    34. 况胜剑，廖恒，姚单君，张钦，秦松，张爱华. 我国夏季绿肥的种植及利用现状研究进展. 江苏农业科学. 2022(20): 62-68 .
    35. 王晋龙，孙崇凤，程永钢，郑普山，洪坚平. 不同绿肥对复垦地土壤化学性状及酶活性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料. 2022(11): 85-93 .
    36. 赵曼利，戴志刚，顾炽明，胡文诗，李银水，秦璐，鲁明星，廖星. 油菜用地养地的作物优势及其在冬闲田开发中的应用潜力. 中国油料作物学报. 2022(06): 1139-1147 .
    37. 宁万军，张强，黄闽敏，刘旭丽. 绿肥间作翻压处理对新新2号核桃性状及土壤养分的影响. 果树学报. 2022(11): 2124-2132 .
    38. 王乾坤，刘全兰，卢永忠，张晓冬. 绿肥与促生菌对甘薯连作土壤的改良研究. 安徽农业科学. 2022(21): 153-155 .
    39. 王晋龙，孙崇凤，程永钢，郑普山，洪坚平. 不同绿肥对复垦地土壤化学性状及酶活性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料. 2022(09): 85-93 .
    40. 延荷，方林发，邓茂林，刘正兰，石孝均，张宇亭. 毛叶苕子替代化学氮肥对幼龄柑橘氮素营养的贡献. 中国土壤与肥料. 2022(12): 176-182 .
    41. 严磊，张中彬，丁英志，王玥凯，王永玖，甘磊，彭新华. 覆盖作物根系对砂姜黑土压实的响应. 土壤学报. 2021(01): 140-150 .
    42. 芦海灵，张翔，李亮，范艺宽，张盟，张艳玲，杨欣，梁太波，翟振，戴华鑫. 深耕和绿肥掩青条件下生物炭对烟叶产质量和土壤养分的影响. 烟草科技. 2021(05): 14-22 .
    43. 何万荣，韩路，席琳乔，王海珍. 南疆枣园三种不同绿肥腐解及养分释放规律研究. 干旱地区农业研究. 2021(03): 129-136 .
    44. 冯璞阳，谢恩泽，白亚妮，颜宏，李文孝，梁建强，赵文娟. 陕西省畜禽粪肥资源现状及其替代化肥潜力分析. 四川农业大学学报. 2021(03): 391-399 .
    45. 朱吉风，王伟荣，张俊英，江建霞，蒋美艳，李延莉，杨立勇，周熙荣. 油菜不同器官水浸提液对水稻和高粱种子萌发的影响. 上海农业学报. 2021(03): 7-13 .
    46. 白璐，蒋福祯，曹卫东，李正鹏，严清彪，韩梅. 麦后复种绿肥对土壤有机碳及其固持特征的影响. 干旱地区农业研究. 2021(04): 148-154 .
    47. 王国璀，张松茂，胡发龙，殷文，樊志龙，范虹，于爱忠，赵财，柴强. 绿洲灌区春小麦产量和氮素利用率对绿肥还田量的响应. 植物营养与肥料学报. 2021(07): 1164-1172 . 本站查看
    48. 程文龙，李敏，韩上，卜容燕，王慧，唐杉，武盼盼，张军，葛自兵，武际. 不同种类夏绿肥对设施土壤的改良效应. 中国土壤与肥料. 2021(04): 83-87 .
    49. 王赟，付利波，梁海，章子含，杨伟，何正海，高嵩涓，曹卫东. 绿肥作物对云南旱地土壤镉有效性的影响. 农业环境科学学报. 2021(10): 2124-2133 .
    50. 刘康，韦彩会，廖祥生，谢立华，廖星，秦璐，何铁光. 广西绿肥专用型油菜品种（系）筛选试验. 现代农业科技. 2021(21): 47-51 .
    51. 戴伊莎，成欣，刘帮艳，何鲜，胡梦阳，杨武魁，王龙昌，武海燕，李茜，吴进红. 秸秆和紫云英协同覆盖对西南旱地土壤养分、酶活性及小麦产量的影响. 土壤通报. 2021(06): 1339-1347 .
    52. 李晋，杨晓晓，杨文平，李文广，景豆豆，杨珍平，高志强. 饲料油菜压青还田对后作小麦土壤真菌群落的影响. 微生物学报. 2021(09): 2869-2882 .
    53. Jiaxi YIN，Caihui WEI，Hongqin TANG，Wenbin Dong，Zhongyi LI. Research Progress on Application of Rape as Green Manure. Agricultural Biotechnology. 2020(02): 64-68+72 .
    54. 杨劲明，王禹童，陈冰，刘满意，王蓓蓓，阮云泽，赵艳. 豆科绿肥残体对连作蕉园土壤肥力的影响. 热带作物学报. 2020(03): 433-440 .
    55. 李小艳，孟娟，牛瑞瑞，翟红莲，薛鹏飞. 黄河三角洲地区不同种植模式下人造白蜡林的土壤养分特征研究. 中国农学通报. 2020(12): 53-57 .
    56. 文章荣，李广浩，王珏，张世博，顾晓天，丁梦秋，陆卫平，陆大雷. 江苏省鲜食玉米化肥农药使用及生产现状调研与分析. 江苏农业科学. 2020(07): 91-96 .
    57. 朱亚琼，简大为，郑伟，王朴，黎松松，郝帅，娜尔克孜，刘岳含，艾丽菲热. 不同种植模式下豆科绿肥对土壤改良效果的影响. 草业科学. 2020(05): 889-900 .
    58. 杨叶华，张松，王帅，刘正兰，方林发，张学良，刘瑞，张建伟，张宇亭，石孝均. 中国不同区域常见绿肥产量和养分含量特征及替代氮肥潜力评估. 草业学报. 2020(06): 39-55 .
    59. 张树杰，陈灿，张红升，于荣. 绿肥油菜研究进展. 安徽农业科学. 2020(15): 24-27 .
    60. 陈晓芬，陈静蕊，秦文婧，武志峰，李淑惠，刘明，徐昌旭，刘佳. 红壤荒地上7种豆科绿肥养分富集能力综合评价. 中国草地学报. 2020(04): 153-160 .
    61. 况胜剑，王文华. 翻压绿肥对土壤微生物性状影响的研究进展. 贵州农业科学. 2020(08): 64-67 .
    62. 刘海洋，王伟，张仁福，姚举. 棉花与几种作物根际土壤酶活性及细菌多样性分析. 新疆农业科学. 2020(08): 1514-1526 .
    63. 唐治喜，高菊生，宋阿琳，王恩召，司知远，易可可，黄晶，赵士诚，范分良. 用宏基因组学方法研究绿肥对水稻根际微生物磷循环功能基因的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报. 2020(09): 1578-1590 . 本站查看
    64. 刘慧，李子玉，白志贵，刘建国. 油菜绿肥翻压还田对新疆盐碱土壤的改良效果研究. 农业资源与环境学报. 2020(06): 914-923 .
    65. 王琳，管永祥，陈震，周影，魏启舜，黄莹，郭成宝. 不同种类绿肥养分积累比较及其对水稻产量的影响. 江苏农业学报. 2020(05): 1139-1143 .
    66. 谭杰辉，付双军，南丽丽，康发云，程燕明. 轮作绿肥对黄土高原半干旱区土壤微生物数量及酶活性的影响. 草原与草坪. 2020(05): 116-123 .
    67. 苟志文，殷文，徐龙龙，何小七，王琦明，柴强. 绿洲灌区复种豆科绿肥条件下小麦稳产的减氮潜力. 植物营养与肥料学报. 2020(12): 2195-2203 . 本站查看
    68. 高文杰，程飞，廖博一，林俊平，蔡泉星，刘爱琴. 套种绿肥对桉树人工林土壤理化性质的影响. 西北林学院学报. 2019(01): 54-61 .
    69. 何红霞，李小涵，包明，李超，马小龙，何刚，邱炜红，王朝辉. 栽培模式对旱地小麦产量和土壤肥力的影响. 应用生态学报. 2019(02): 573-582 .
    70. 顾炽明，李银水，谢立华，胡小加，廖星，秦璐. 浅析油菜作为绿肥的应用优势. 中国土壤与肥料. 2019(01): 180-183 .
    71. 严红星，田飞，刘建国，刘勇军，彭曙光，靳志丽，罗建新. 绿肥、稻草还田对植烟土壤团聚体组成及有机质分布的影响. 烟草科技. 2019(04): 9-16 .
    72. 何庆海，方茹，黄旭波，秦玉川，王衍彬，刘本同，杨少宗. 绿肥鼠茅自然群落物种多样性及其与环境因子间的关系. 浙江农业学报. 2019(05): 806-815 .
    73. 丁倩. 绿肥翻耕配合催腐剂对花生土壤肥力及其产量的影响. 新疆农业科技. 2019(01): 32-33 .
    74. 李清. 主要绿肥根冠比的初步研究. 南方农机. 2019(13): 23+32 .
    75. 张树杰，陈灿，张红升，魏鹏，安磊. 翻压油菜绿肥对枸杞产量和土壤养分含量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究. 2019(03): 157-161 .
    76. 李文广，杨晓晓，黄春国，薛乃雯，夏清，刘小丽，张晓琪，杨思，杨珍平，高志强. 饲料油菜作绿肥对后茬麦田土壤肥力及细菌群落的影响. 中国农业科学. 2019(15): 2664-2677 .
    77. 刘本同，秦玉川，王衍彬，黄旭波，求鹏英，王丽玲，方茹. 鼠茅间作对桃形李林地水土保持、土壤理化性质及果实品质的影响. 安徽农业科学. 2019(14): 163-166 .
    78. 陈海生，何文，杨海霞，梁振华，张秀芬，郭素云，刘连军，黎萍，卢美瑛，李恒锐. 木薯与红籽瓜间套种模式研究及效益分析. 中国瓜菜. 2019(08): 74-79 .
    79. 张晓琪，景豆豆，杨珍平，张春来，高志强. 绿肥苜蓿合理还田提高旱地小麦产量及土壤养分研究. 华北农学报. 2019(S1): 221-227 .
    80. 付威，雍晨旭，马东豪，樊军，张佳宝，魏宏安，冯小龙，魏润哲，刘霄飞，王光东，谭钧. 黄土丘陵沟壑区治沟造地土壤快速培肥效应. 农业工程学报. 2019(21): 252-261 .
    81. 朱波，徐绮雯，马淑敏，张小短，邢毅，王龙昌. 干旱胁迫和钾肥对油菜苗期生物量和水分利用特征的影响. 干旱地区农业研究. 2019(06): 57-64 .
    82. 谭克均，黄国斌，夏忠敏，郭晓芸. 耕地保护与质量提升技术推广应用成效研究. 安徽农业科学. 2018(05): 140-143 .
    83. 黄国斌，谭克均，夏忠敏. 绿肥还田对耕地质量的影响. 贵州农业科学. 2018(03): 67-70 .
    84. 陆艳仙，周晓果，陶彦良，赵明威，朱宏光，温远光，蔡道雄，贾宏炎，李晓琼. 炼山和套种绿肥对桉树人工林下植物和土壤C:N:P化学计量特征的影响. 广西科学. 2018(02): 139-148 .
    85. 魏静，郭树芳，孙本华，翟丽梅，王洪媛，刘宏斌，华玲玲，杨波. 冬季覆盖作物对潮褐土土壤肥力和微生物学性状的影响. 生态与农村环境学报. 2018(05): 426-432 .
    86. 王俊，薄晶晶，付鑫. 填闲种植及其在黄土高原旱作农业区的可行性分析. 生态学报. 2018(14): 5244-5254 .
    87. 杨蒙岭，蒋豪，顾勇，谢强，张永辉，张丹. 绿肥混合翻压还田对土壤性状及烟叶品质的影响. 中国烟草科学. 2018(01): 42-48 .
    88. 罗庆川，邹成华，樊庆，曾家玉，饶勇. 适宜贵州山区种植的绿肥用油菜品种筛选. 农技服务. 2018(01): 78-79+81 .
    89. 王汉中. 以新需求为导向的油菜产业发展战略. 中国油料作物学报. 2018(05): 613-617 .
    90. 李建辉，刘丽丽，张文标，石子建. 种植及翻压绿肥的生态学效应. 现代农业科技. 2017(19): 176+178 .
    91. 刘领，李继伟，任鹏，赵世民，王慧，李友军. 不同芸薹属绿肥对烤烟生长及产量的影响. 河南农业科学. 2017(08): 52-56+76 .
    92. 刘领，李继伟，刘杉，赵世民，李友军. 芸薹属绿肥对烤烟根系及土壤酶活性的影响. 河南科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2017(03): 74-79+8 .
    93. 杜威，王紫泉，和文祥，高亚军，曹卫东. 豆科绿肥对渭北旱塬土壤养分及生态化学计量学特征影响. 土壤学报. 2017(04): 999-1008 .

    Other cited types(88)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (2794) PDF downloads (690) Cited by(181)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Copyright© 2006-2010 Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science.

    Tel：010-82108653 Email：zwyf@caas.cn

    京ICP备14003094号-3

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. Technical support: info@rhhz.net   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return